- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 09:37:55 -0500
- To: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
The draft minutes from the January 7 Widgets voice conference are available at the following and copied below: http://www.w3.org/2010/01/07-wam-minutes.html WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send them to the public-webapps mail list before 14 January 2010 (the next Widgets voice conference); otherwise these minutes will be considered Approved. -Regards, Art Barstow [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ - DRAFT - Web Applications Working Group Teleconference 07 Jan 2010 [2]Agenda [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/ 2010JanMar/0053.html See also: [3]IRC log [3] http://www.w3.org/2010/01/07-wam-irc Attendees Present David, Art, Steven, Marcos, Robin, Marcin_Hanclik, Marcin, Josh Regrets Frederick Chair Art Scribe Art Contents * [4]Topics 1. [5]Review and tweak agenda 2. [6]Announcements 3. [7]Letter from ISO JTC1/SC 34/WG4 4. [8]Status of URI Scheme spec 5. [9]Status of View Modes Media Features (VM-MF) spec: 6. [10]Status of Updates spec 7. [11]AOB * [12]Summary of Action Items _________________________________________________________ <trackbot> Date: 07 January 2010 <Steven> oops <scribe> Scribe: Art <Steven> How many people are joining? <scribe> ScribeNick: ArtB <scribe> Meeting: Widgets Voice Conference Date: 7 January 2010 Review and tweak agenda AB: the draft agenda was sent out yesterday ( [13]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2010JanMar/00 53.html ). Any change requests? [13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/ 2010JanMar/0053.html [ no ] Announcements AB: WARP LC comment period ends Jan 13. Does anyone have any short announcements? [ no ] Letter from ISO JTC1/SC 34/WG4 AB: On 29 December, Mohamed ZERGAOUI sent WebApps an letter ( [14]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/15 00.html ) on behalf of ISO SC34/WG4. The letter notes some similarities between our widget packaging spec and their Open Packaging Conventions spec. ... I have not read the OPC spec; anyone read it? [14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/ 2009OctDec/1500.html MC: I read it AB: anything you want to share about it? MC: during our req gathering phase, we discussed similarities ... I have refs to the original emails ... this was mentioned by IBM (JonF) ... it was at least 2 years ago ... a conclusion was that ISO should start a ISO ZIP WG ... but don't know if that started or not ... I think ISO should create an ISO ZIP spec ... it would be good to get a real ZIP standard ... and not just some PKWare spec AB: I recall those conversations with JonF on this subject <timeless_mbp> Zakim: +??p12 is me <scribe> ACTION: barstow respond to Mohamed's 29-Dec-2009 email from ISO SC34/WG4 [recorded in [15]http://www.w3.org/2010/01/07-wam-minutes.html#action01] <trackbot> Created ACTION-474 - Respond to Mohamed's 29-Dec-2009 email from ISO SC34/WG4 [on Arthur Barstow - due 2010-01-14]. AB: after I respond, Marcos, perhaps you can respond too MC: OK AB: anything else on this topic for today? [ no ] Status of URI Scheme spec SP: should this ISO be coordinated via HCG? ... external coord typically goes thru HCG AB: good question ... I can forward it to HCG and seek comments SP: yes, a heads-up to them would be good <scribe> ACTION: barstow forward ISO packaging email to HCG [recorded in [16]http://www.w3.org/2010/01/07-wam-minutes.html#action02] <trackbot> Created ACTION-475 - Forward ISO packaging email to HCG [on Arthur Barstow - due 2010-01-14]. AB: Robin, what is the status of the URI Scheme spec ( [17]http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2006/waf/widgets-uri/ )? [17] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2006/waf/widgets-uri/ RB: Larry replied on the TAG list ... also got some feedback from Jonathan Rees ... we need to continue discussions AB: so related discussions are happening on www-tag? RB: yes AB: we all have an action to contribute to the related discussion on www-tag ... I haven't been following that list ... anything else on this spec for today? RB: no; Larry's comments need to be discussed Status of View Modes Media Features (VM-MF) spec: AB: would one of the Editors of the VMMF spec please give a short status of the spec ( [18]http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-vmmf/ ). [18] http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-vmmf/ MH: last month I commented on VF's related input ... I am in the process of reflecting those comments in the spec ... but only a local copy now ... I will have something to review in a week ... the VF proposal included some interfaces ... that will need to be addressed in the context of the VM-I spec AB: any status on VM-I status to report? MH: it needs to be developed in paralle with VM-MF spec ... should be ready for a CfC on FPWD of VM-I within a week or two AB: an action to all to reveiew VM-I spec in the context of "is it ready for FPWD" ( [19]http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-vm/vm-interfaces.src.html ) [19] http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-vm/vm-interfaces.src.html MH: re, the VM-I spec, it resembles D3E spec ... I may move VM-I to ReSpec but D3E is probably too big to move ... I have been discussing this with Doug Schepers AB: any other comments on the VM specs? [ no ] Status of Updates spec AB: anything to report on the Updates spec ( [20]http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-updates/ ) Marcos? [20] http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-updates/ <drogers> sorry I have a small comment DR: re VM-MF or VM-I, doesn't have a Sec Consids sec ... will both have a Sec Consids section? MH: VM-I does not have such a section yet ... it's still early and one can be added DR: I'll look into what could be added MH: It's OK with me if we add such a section to VM-I MC: I expect to restart work on it next week ... hope to get it ready for a new pub by end of the month AB: any other status for today before AOB? [ none ] AOB AB: would like to take a quick look at the Widgets pub status page ( [21]http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/PubStatus#Widgets_Specificat ions ) and update accordingly. ... I last updated the table a few weeks ago ... any updates needed? [21] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/ PubStatus#Widgets_Specifications [ none ] AB: any other business for today? ... voice confs ... frequency going forward ... last call for discussion topics for today <darobin> bye! AB: meeting adjourned Summary of Action Items [NEW] ACTION: barstow forward ISO packaging email to HCG [recorded in [22]http://www.w3.org/2010/01/07-wam-minutes.html#action02] [NEW] ACTION: barstow respond to Mohamed's 29-Dec-2009 email from ISO SC34/WG4 [recorded in [23]http://www.w3.org/2010/01/07-wam-minutes.html#action01] [End of minutes]
Received on Thursday, 7 January 2010 14:40:28 UTC