- From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:25:02 +0100
- To: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
- Cc: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, public-webapps@w3.org, www-style@w3.org, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote: > On Mar 18, 2010, at 6:44 AM, Marcos Caceres wrote: > >>> 4. all these queries could/should have an event-based counterpart so the >>> changes are detectable by code. We understand this is outside of the >>> scope of this spec but that's still an important comment. >> >> We have a proposal already for the CSS WG to review: >> http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-vm/vm-interfaces.src.html > > It seems like this needs to align to the current CSS OM View spec: > <http://dev.w3.org/csswg/cssom-view/> > > which has a StyleMedia interface available on the window object as 'styleMedia', rather than 'media'. > > I would expect to see events related to media type changes in the CSS OM View spec too, rather than in a widgets-related spec. I totally agree, there is much overlap. We should start looking at how to merge the two specs (or our requirements) into the CSS OM View spec. I would be happy for the widgets one to vanish if the CSS OM View spec would handled our use cases. Perhaps we should have a joint teleconf or something to arrange how to proceed... I'll leave that up to the chairs, however. Kind regards, Marcos -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Friday, 26 March 2010 12:25:55 UTC