On Mar 2, 2010, at 2:59 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > Hi, > > it appears to me that this header replicates something that is > already there; just use the last event ID as etag, and then you can > do something like: > > GET /foobar HTTP/1.1 > If-None-Match: "abc" > > Note that this makes If-None-Match a request header on which the > response varies, thus it should carry: > > Vary: If-None-Match > > ...but this is the case for Last-Event-ID as well. Using If-None-Match this way seems like a bad fit in a couple of ways: - Event IDs are not ETags at the HTTP level. It seems like a layering violation to treat event IDs, or indeed anything in the response body rather than in the ETag header, as entity tags. - If-None-Match does a conditional GET. But a 304 response to an EventSource request would not make sense under any circumstances. The server should wait until it has more events to send, not tell the client to consult a cached copy. The client likely won't even have a cached copy. Regards, MaciejReceived on Tuesday, 2 March 2010 11:54:14 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:13:05 UTC