public-webapps@w3.org from January to March 2010 by author

Aaron Boodman

• Re: [IndexedDB] API feedback (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] API feedback (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) (Thursday, 4 March)

Adam Barth

• Re: [widgets] API - openURL security considerations (Friday, 19 February)
• Re: [widgets] API - openURL security considerations (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme (Thursday, 28 January)
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme (Thursday, 28 January)
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme (Tuesday, 26 January)
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme (Monday, 25 January)
• Re: FYI: review of draft-abarth-mime-sniff-03 (Thursday, 21 January)
• Re: FYI: review of draft-abarth-mime-sniff-03 (Thursday, 21 January)
• Re: [UMP] Server opt-in (Thursday, 14 January)
• Re: [UMP] Server opt-in (Wednesday, 13 January)
• Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of Uniform Messaging Policy spec; deadline January 19 (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: [UMP] Server opt-in (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: [UMP] Proxy-Authorization (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: [UMP] Server opt-in (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: [UMP] Server opt-in (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: [UMP] Server opt-in (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: [UMP] Proxy-Authorization (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: [UMP] Proxy-Authorization (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: [UMP] Proxy-Authorization (Sunday, 10 January)
• Re: [UMP] Feedback on UMP from a quick read (Saturday, 9 January)
• Re: [UMP] Feedback on UMP from a quick read (Saturday, 9 January)
• [UMP] Proxy-Authorization (Saturday, 9 January)
• Re: [UMP] Feedback on UMP from a quick read (Saturday, 9 January)
• Re: [UMP] Feedback on UMP from a quick read (Saturday, 9 January)
• Re: [UMP] Feedback on UMP from a quick read (Friday, 8 January)
• Re: [UMP] Feedback on UMP from a quick read (Friday, 8 January)
• [UMP] Feedback on UMP from a quick read (Friday, 8 January)

Adrian Bateman

• RE: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2 (Wednesday, 20 January)

Andrew Fedoniouk

• Re: [selectors-api] comments on Selectors API Level 2 (Wednesday, 20 January)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: FormData with sliced Blob (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: [XHR2] term "flag", for authors (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: FormData with sliced Blob (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: [Notifications] feedback requested on new Editor's Draft (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: FormData with sliced Blob (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName (Thursday, 18 March)
• Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec (Tuesday, 16 March)
• Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec (Tuesday, 16 March)
• Re: Notifications (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest send() Method Uploads On Inappropriate HTTP Protocols (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest send() Method Uploads On Inappropriate HTTP Protocols (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: [XHR2] new XMLHttpRequest(anon) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: [XHR2] new XMLHttpRequest(anon) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: [XHR2] new XMLHttpRequest(anon) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: [XHR2] new XMLHttpRequest(anon) (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [XHR2] new XMLHttpRequest(anon) (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [XHR] status (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: XHR LC comment: header encoding (Tuesday, 16 February)
• [xhr] authorization (was: Re: call for reviewers: XMLHttpRequest Last Call) (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: ISSUE-114 (CORS-credentials): CORS does not define the effect of the credentials flag in sufficient detail [CORS] (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: ISSUE-115 (xhr-referer): XHR does not specify what URL to use for Referer [XHR] (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: FormData questions (Sunday, 14 February)
• Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: [XHR] RfC for Guidelines for Web Content Transformation Proxies; deadline 11 March (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: Rechartering WebApp WG (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: Inconsistency in Web SQL Database Spec (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: XHR HTTP method support, Re: XHR LC comments (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: Inconsistency in Web SQL Database Spec (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest specification lacks security considerations (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest specification lacks security considerations (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest specification lacks security considerations (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: XHR LC comment: header encoding (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: Notifications (Friday, 5 February)
• Re: Notifications (Friday, 5 February)
• Re: Notifications (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: Notifications (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: Notifications (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: Notifications (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: Notifications (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: Notifications (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: [xhr] events for async requests (Monday, 1 February)
• Re: [xhr] events for async requests (Monday, 1 February)
• Re: [xhr] events for async requests (Monday, 1 February)
• Re: [XHR] New api request (Monday, 1 February)
• Re: [xhr] events for async requests (Monday, 1 February)
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() (Monday, 1 February)
• [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() (Sunday, 31 January)
• Re: [XHR] same-origin request event rules are underspecified (Sunday, 31 January)
• Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest specification lacks security considerations (Sunday, 31 January)
• Re: [xhr] events for async requests (was: Re: [whatwg] Thread to run Web Socket feedback from the protocol ?) (Sunday, 31 January)
• Re: XHR LC comment: header encoding (Sunday, 31 January)
• Re: [XHR] New api request (Sunday, 31 January)
• Re: XHR (Sunday, 31 January)
• Re: [XHR][XHR2] HTTP redirects / XHR Version detection (Sunday, 31 January)
• Re: [XHR][XHR2] HTTP redirects / XHR Version detection (Saturday, 30 January)
• Re: [UMP] updated editor's draft of "Uniform Messaging Policy" on W3C site (Wednesday, 6 January)
• Re: XHR LC comment: header encoding (Tuesday, 5 January)
• Re: XHR LC comment: header encoding (Tuesday, 5 January)
• Re: XHR LC comment: header encoding (Tuesday, 5 January)
• Re: XHR LC comment: header encoding (Monday, 4 January)

Anton Muhin

• Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName (Saturday, 13 February)
• Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName (Friday, 12 February)
• Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName (Friday, 22 January)

Arthur Barstow

• [widgets] Draft agenda for 1 April 2010 voice conf (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: [widgets] Seeking pre-LCWD comments for View Modes Media Feature; deadline March 17 (Tuesday, 23 March)
• [widgets] URI spec: Note for authors (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: [widgets] Span example (Friday, 19 March)
• DOM 3 Core errata [Was: Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName] (Thursday, 18 March)
• [widgets] Draft minutes for 18 March 2010 voice conf (Thursday, 18 March)
• [widgets] Draft agenda for 18 March 2010 Voice Conf; ** 1 hr earlier for Europe ** (Wednesday, 17 March)
• Request for Comments: Media Resource specs (Tuesday, 16 March)
• [widgets] IESG Approved Media Type application/widget (Thursday, 4 March)
• [widgets] Seeking pre-LCWD comments for View Modes Media Feature; deadline March 17 (Thursday, 4 March)
• [widgets] Draft Minutes for 4 March 2010 voice conference (Thursday, 4 March)
• [widgets] Draft agenda for 4 March 2010 voice conf (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Fwd: Information about latest specs for language tagging (Monday, 1 March)
• [widgets] Draft minutes from 25 February 2010 voice conf (Thursday, 25 February)
• [widgets] Draft agenda for 25 February 2010 voice conference (Wednesday, 24 February)
• [widgets] Draft minutes from 18 February 2010 voice conf (Thursday, 18 February)
• [widgets] Draft agenda for 18 February 2010 voice conf (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Social APIs (was: Rechartering WebApp WG) (Sunday, 14 February)
• FYI: W3C Workshop on Future Standards for Model-Based User Interfaces (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 11 February 2010 voice conf (Friday, 12 February)
• [XHR] RfC for Guidelines for Web Content Transformation Proxies; deadline 11 March (Friday, 12 February)
• [widgets] Testing infrastructure for Widget Access Request Policy (WARP) spec (Thursday, 11 February)
• [notifications] what are the requirements? [Was: Re: Notifications] (Thursday, 11 February)
• [widgets] Draft minutes from 11 February 2010 voice conference (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: Rechartering WebApp WG (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 11 February 2010 voice conf (Thursday, 11 February)
• [widgets] Draft Agenda for 11 February 2010 voice conf (Wednesday, 10 February)
• [widgets] LCWDs of XML Signature specs published (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: Rechartering WebApp WG (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2 (Thursday, 4 February)
• [widgets] Draft Minutes for 4-Feb-2010 voice conference (Thursday, 4 February)
• Standardizing Web Timing? (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: [widgets] P&C: comments submitted after 1-Dec-2009 CR#2 publication (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: [widgets] P&C: comments submitted after 1-Dec-2009 CR#2 publication (Wednesday, 3 February)
• [widgets] Draft Agenda for 4 February 2010 voice conf (Wednesday, 3 February)
• [widgets] P&C: comments submitted after 1-Dec-2009 CR#2 publication (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Seeking implementation data for CORS and UMP (Sunday, 31 January)
• [widgets] follow-ups on the URI scheme spec (Friday, 29 January)
• Re: Window id - an idea to make multi page web application easier (Friday, 29 January)
• [widgets] Draft Minutes for 21 January 2010 voice conference (Thursday, 21 January)
• [widgets] Draft agenda for 21 January 2010 voice conf (Wednesday, 20 January)
• Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2 (Tuesday, 19 January)
• Re: Adopting postMessage and MessageChannel from HTML5? (Tuesday, 19 January)
• Re: Re-introduction (Monday, 18 January)
• Re: CfC: to publish FPWD of Selectors API Level 2; deadline January 15 (Friday, 15 January)
• Re: Restart the group (Friday, 15 January)
• Re: Adopting postMessage and MessageChannel from HTML5? (Thursday, 14 January)
• [widgets] No Voice Conf on 14 January; next call is 21 January (Wednesday, 13 January)
• CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of Uniform Messaging Policy spec; deadline January 19 (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: Adopting postMessage and MessageChannel from HTML5? (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: Adopting postMessage and MessageChannel from HTML5? (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: Adopting postMessage and MessageChannel from HTML5? (Saturday, 9 January)
• CfC: to publish FPWD of Selectors API Level 2; deadline January 15 (Saturday, 9 January)
• Re: Letter to the W3C Web Applications WG from ISO JTC1/SC 34/WG4 (Friday, 8 January)
• [widgets] DigSig - proposed change to XML Signature Properties (Thursday, 7 January)
• [widgets] Draft Minutes for 7 January 2010 Voice Conference (Thursday, 7 January)
• [widgets] Draft Agenda for 7 January 2010 Voice Conf (Wednesday, 6 January)
• [widgets] Reminder: RfC for LCWD of Widget Access Request Policy spec; deadline 13-Jan-2010 (Tuesday, 5 January)
• CfC: new WD of Programmable HTTP Caching and Serving; deadline January 11 (Monday, 4 January)

Arun Ranganathan

• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. (Tuesday, 12 January)

Arve Bersvendsen

• Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec (Thursday, 11 March)
• Re: [widgets] API - openURL security considerations (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: Rechartering WebApp WG (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: [WARP] Use cases for local network access (Thursday, 4 February)
• One <feature>, multiple resources (Friday, 29 January)
• Re: [WARP] Extending access to local network resources (Thursday, 21 January)
• Re: [WARP] Extending access to local network resources (Thursday, 21 January)

Aryeh Gregor

• Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest specification lacks security considerations (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest specification lacks security considerations (Tuesday, 9 February)

ashok malhotra

• Re: ACTION-401Ask WebApps to Review Taxonomy (Wednesday, 17 March)
• ACTION-401Ask WebApps to Review Taxonomy (Thursday, 11 March)

Bert Bos

• Re: [selectors-api] comments on Selectors API Level 2 (Thursday, 21 January)
• Re: [selectors-api] comments on Selectors API Level 2 (Thursday, 21 January)

Bil Corry

• Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest specification lacks security considerations (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest specification lacks security considerations (Wednesday, 10 February)

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName (Saturday, 13 February)
• Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: [widgets] Applying Stylesheets to Resources (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: [widgets] Applying Stylesheets to Resources (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: XHR LC comment: header encoding (Friday, 5 February)
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme (Thursday, 28 January)
• Re: [selectors-api] comments on Selectors API Level 2 (Thursday, 21 January)
• Re: [selectors-api] comments on Selectors API Level 2 (Thursday, 21 January)
• Re: Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD? (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD? (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD? (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD? (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD? (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: XHR LC comment: header encoding (Tuesday, 5 January)
• Re: XHR LC comment: header encoding (Monday, 4 January)
• Re: XHR LC comment: header encoding (Monday, 4 January)
• Re: XHR LC comment: header encoding (Monday, 4 January)

Brad Kemper

• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for View Modes Media Feature; deadline March 17 (Wednesday, 10 March)

bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

• [Bug 8241] Named properties on window (Friday, 29 January)
• [Bug 8814] New: Introduction paragraph and example are out of sync (Monday, 25 January)
• [Bug 8241] Named properties on window (Sunday, 17 January)
• [Bug 8758] New: Define DOMContentLoaded (Thursday, 14 January)
• [Bug 8241] Named properties on window (Wednesday, 6 January)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call (Saturday, 13 March)
• Re: Web services and Rich Internet Applications documentation request (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: Re-introduction (Monday, 18 January)

Charles Pritchard

• Re: Event handlers - Pointer Devices (Thursday, 11 March)
• Advanced Pointer Events: Use Cases (Wednesday, 10 March)
• Re: Event handlers - Pointer Devices (Thursday, 4 March)
• Event handlers - Pointer Devices (Wednesday, 3 March)

Chris Anderson

• IndexedDB and MVCC (Friday, 15 January)

Chris Prince

• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. (Wednesday, 13 January)

Christian Biesinger

• [XHR] setRequestHeader and redirects (Monday, 22 March)

Cyril Concolato

• Re: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 11 February 2010 voice conf (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 11 February 2010 voice conf (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: MPEG-U (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: MPEG-U (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: [widgets] TWI: comments (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: [widgets-twi] window object (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: [widgets] TWI: comments (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: [widgets-twi] window object (Friday, 5 February)
• [widgets] TWI: comments (Thursday, 4 February)
• [widgets-twi] window object (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: MPEG-U (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: MPEG-U (Wednesday, 20 January)
• Re: MPEG-U (Wednesday, 13 January)
• Re: MPEG-U (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: [widgets] feature: inconsistent behavior ? (Thursday, 7 January)
• Re: MPEG-U (Thursday, 7 January)
• Re: [widgets] P&C simplifying some rules (editorial) (Wednesday, 6 January)
• Re: [widgets] feature: inconsistent behavior ? (Wednesday, 6 January)
• Re: [widgets] feature: inconsistent behavior ? (Wednesday, 6 January)
• Re: [widgets] P&C simplifying some rules (editorial) (Wednesday, 6 January)
• Re: [widgets] features: default value for required (Wednesday, 6 January)
• Re: [widgets] duplicated feature elements ? (Wednesday, 6 January)

Daniel Glazman

• CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec (Thursday, 11 March)
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for View Modes Media Feature; deadline March 17 (Wednesday, 10 March)
• Fwd: Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for View Modes Media Feature; deadline March 17 (Tuesday, 9 March)
• [selectors-api] comments on Selectors API Level 2 (Wednesday, 20 January)

Darin Fisher

• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: FormData with sliced Blob (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: Adding Content-Disposition header to File.urn response (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? (Wednesday, 24 March)
• [FileAPI] Blob.URN? (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: FormData with sliced Blob (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: Notifications (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. (Friday, 15 January)
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. (Friday, 15 January)

David Bruant

• Re: [XHR][XHR2] HTTP redirects / XHR Version detection (Saturday, 30 January)
• [XHR][XHR2] HTTP redirects / XHR Version detection (Saturday, 23 January)

David Geer

• Web services and Rich Internet Applications documentation request (Tuesday, 23 February)
• How do I join this list? (Tuesday, 16 February)

David Levin

• Re: FormData with sliced Blob (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: Notifications (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: Notifications (Friday, 5 February)

David Rogers

• RE: VMMF - new version (Wednesday, 24 March)
• RE: VMMF — new version (Wednesday, 10 March)
• FW: OMTP BONDI 1.1 Approved Release (Wednesday, 24 February)
• RE: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 11 February 2010 voice conf (Wednesday, 10 February)
• RE: [widgets] P&C: comments submitted after 1-Dec-2009 CR#2 publication (Wednesday, 3 February)
• RE: [widgets] P&C: comments submitted after 1-Dec-2009 CR#2 publication (Wednesday, 3 February)
• RE: [widgets] P&C: comments submitted after 1-Dec-2009 CR#2 publication (Wednesday, 3 February)

Dean Landolt

• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2 (Friday, 29 January)

Devdatta

• Re: [UMP] Server opt-in (Wednesday, 13 January)

Dimitri Glazkov

• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call (Friday, 12 March)

Dirk Pranke

• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call (Saturday, 13 March)
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call (Friday, 12 March)

Dmitry Titov

• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: FormData with sliced Blob (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: Notifications (Friday, 26 February)
• Re: FormData questions (Monday, 15 February)
• Re: FormData questions (Sunday, 14 February)
• Re: Notifications (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. (Monday, 1 February)
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. (Thursday, 21 January)
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. (Wednesday, 20 January)
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. (Wednesday, 20 January)
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. (Friday, 15 January)
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. (Friday, 15 January)
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. (Friday, 15 January)
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. (Wednesday, 13 January)
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. (Saturday, 9 January)
• File API: Blob and underlying file changes. (Friday, 8 January)

Dominique Hazael-Massieux

• Re: [WARP] comment on subdomains (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: [WARP] comment on subdomains (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: [widgets] Testing infrastructure for Widget Access Request Policy (WARP) spec (Monday, 15 February)
• Re: [widgets] Testing infrastructure for Widget Access Request Policy (WARP) spec (Monday, 15 February)
• [widgets-interface] Marking Widget as [NoInterfaceObject] (Friday, 29 January)
• Re: A Method for Writing Testable Conformance Clauses and its Applications (Was Re: Write up of test assertion extraction methodology) (Wednesday, 20 January)

Doug Schepers

• Re: Items not listed as "new" in the draft charter (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: Items not listed as "new" in the draft charter (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: Items not listed as "new" in the draft charter (Monday, 29 March)
• Re: Items not listed as "new" in the draft charter (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: Event handlers - Pointer Devices (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: Event handlers - Pointer Devices (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: Notifications (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: Notifications (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: Notifications (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: Notifications (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: How do I join this list? (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: How do I join this list? (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Social APIs (was: Rechartering WebApp WG) (Saturday, 13 February)
• Re: Rechartering WebApp WG (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: Window id - an idea to make multi page web application easier (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: [widgets] Applying Stylesheets to Resources (Thursday, 11 February)
• [widgets] Applying Stylesheets to Resources (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: Rechartering WebApp WG (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: Rechartering WebApp WG (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: Rechartering WebApp WG (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: Rechartering WebApp WG (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: Rechartering WebApp WG (Thursday, 11 February)
• Rechartering WebApp WG (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: [widgets] Null in P&C (Tuesday, 2 February)
• Re: [selectors-api] comments on Selectors API Level 2 (Wednesday, 20 January)
• Re: MPEG-U (Wednesday, 20 January)
• Re: A Method for Writing Testable Conformance Clauses and its Applications (Was Re: Write up of test assertion extraction methodology) (Tuesday, 19 January)
• Re: MPEG-U (Wednesday, 13 January)

Drew Wilson

• Re: [Notifications] feedback requested on new Editor's Draft (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: Notifications (Tuesday, 23 February)
• File URN lifetimes and SharedWorkers (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: Notifications (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: Notifications (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: Notifications (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: Notifications (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: Notifications (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: Notifications (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: Notifications (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: Notifications (Friday, 5 February)
• Re: Notifications (Friday, 5 February)
• Re: Notifications (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: Notifications (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: Notifications (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: Notifications (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: Notifications (Wednesday, 3 February)

Dumitru Daniliuc

• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call (Wednesday, 17 March)
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call (Wednesday, 17 March)
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call (Monday, 8 March)
• [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call (Friday, 5 March)
• [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call (Friday, 5 March)
• [WebSQLDatabase] openDatabase() creation callback (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Minor change to spec? (Tuesday, 2 February)
• [WebSQLDatabase] Minor change to spec? (Tuesday, 2 February)

Eric Uhrhane

• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: The most basic File API use case (Saturday, 30 January)
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. (Thursday, 21 January)
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. (Wednesday, 20 January)
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. (Wednesday, 20 January)

Eric Westenberger

• Re: Inconsistency in Web SQL Database Spec (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Inconsistency in Web SQL Database Spec (Tuesday, 9 February)

Felix Sasaki

• Re: i18n comments: (was: [widgets] Span example) (Saturday, 27 March)
• Re: i18n comments: (was: [widgets] Span example) (Saturday, 27 March)
• Re: [widgets] dir and span elements (Wednesday, 10 March)

Frederick Hirsch

• Re: Widget Signature Issue and Proposed Resolution (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Widget Signature Issue and Proposed Resolution (Monday, 29 March)
• Please review LCWD of XML Signature 1.1 and Signature Properties; 2.0 draft information (Friday, 12 February)
• Editorial Update: Signature Properties (Friday, 8 January)
• Re: [widgets] DigSig - proposed change to XML Signature Properties (Thursday, 7 January)

Gregg Tavares

• element.onresize (Tuesday, 2 February)

Hans Meiser

• RE: XMLHttpRequest send() Method Uploads On Inappropriate HTTP Protocols (Tuesday, 23 February)
• RE: XMLHttpRequest send() Method Uploads On Inappropriate HTTP Protocols (Tuesday, 23 February)
• RE: XMLHttpRequest send() Method Uploads On Inappropriate HTTP Protocols (Tuesday, 23 February)
• XMLHttpRequest send() Method Uploads On Inappropriate HTTP Protocols (Tuesday, 23 February)

Harry Halpin

• Re: Social APIs (was: Rechartering WebApp WG) (Wednesday, 17 February)

Henri Sivonen

• Re: Issues with XML Dig Sig and XML Canonicalization; was Re: Rechartering WebApp WG (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: Notifications (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: Notifications (Wednesday, 10 February)

Ian Hickson

• Re: [web databases] SQLStatementErrorCallback (Thursday, 25 March)
• Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName (Wednesday, 17 March)
• Re: Adopting postMessage and MessageChannel from HTML5? (Wednesday, 10 March)
• Re: WebSocket API access to headers (Sunday, 28 February)
• Re: Web Sockets API, buffer handling after the connection is closed (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName (Saturday, 13 February)
• Re: Feedback on WebSocket API, Editor's Draft 13 November 2009. (Tuesday, 2 February)
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Minor change to spec? (Tuesday, 2 February)
• Re: Feedback on WebSocket API, Editor's Draft 13 November 2009. (Monday, 1 February)
• RE: Microsoft pre-LCWD feedback on WebSocket API (Sunday, 31 January)
• Re: Feedback on WebSocket API, Editor's Draft 13 November 2009. (Saturday, 30 January)
• Re: Adopting postMessage and MessageChannel from HTML5? (Saturday, 9 January)
• Adopting postMessage and MessageChannel from HTML5? (Saturday, 9 January)

Jaka Jančar

• [cors] Response header whitelist requires changing the API (Tuesday, 9 March)

James Robinson

• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing (Tuesday, 2 February)
• Re: [XHR] New api request (Friday, 29 January)

Jared Morse

• Re: localStorage Event (Friday, 29 January)
• Re: localStorage Event (Friday, 29 January)
• Re: localStorage Event (Friday, 29 January)
• Re: localStorage Event (Thursday, 28 January)
• Re: localStorage Event (Thursday, 28 January)
• localStorage Event (Thursday, 28 January)

Jeremy Orlow

• [IndexedDB] Exceptions on IndexedDatabaseRequest.open (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Lots of small nits and clarifying questions (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Explaining Asynchronous event-style interface (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Lots of small nits and clarifying questions (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] IDBRequest Interface Questions (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] IDBRequest Interface Questions (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Explaining Asynchronous event-style interface (Monday, 15 March)
• [IndexedDB] Dynamic Transactions (WAS: Lots of small nits and clarifying questions) (Monday, 15 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Lots of small nits and clarifying questions (Monday, 15 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] API feedback (Monday, 15 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) (Tuesday, 2 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Lots of small nits and clarifying questions (Monday, 1 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) (Monday, 1 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Lots of small nits and clarifying questions (Sunday, 28 February)
• Re: Notifications (Tuesday, 23 February)
• [IndexedDB] Lots of small nits and clarifying questions (Thursday, 18 February)
• [IndexedDB] Deleting/managing databases and entity stores (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Detailed comments for the current draft (Thursday, 18 February)
• [IndexedDB] Inverted indexes (for full text search) (Thursday, 18 February)
• [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: Notifications (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: Notifications (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: Notifications (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: Notifications (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Detailed comments for the current draft (Monday, 1 February)
• Re: Some IndexedDB feedback (Monday, 1 February)
• Some IndexedDB feedback (Sunday, 31 January)
• Re: localStorage Event (Friday, 29 January)
• Re: localStorage Event (Friday, 29 January)
• Re: localStorage Event (Thursday, 28 January)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Detailed comments for the current draft (Wednesday, 27 January)
• Re: Interface names in IndexedDB (and WebSQLDatabase) (Wednesday, 27 January)
• Re: Interface names in IndexedDB (and WebSQLDatabase) (Friday, 22 January)
• Interface names in IndexedDB (and WebSQLDatabase) (Friday, 22 January)
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2 (Tuesday, 19 January)

Jian Li

• Adding Content-Disposition header to File.urn response (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: FormData with sliced Blob (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: FormData with sliced Blob (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: FormData with sliced Blob (Tuesday, 23 March)
• FormData with sliced Blob (Saturday, 20 March)
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. (Thursday, 21 January)
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. (Thursday, 21 January)
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. (Thursday, 14 January)

John Gregg

• Re: [Notifications] feedback requested on new Editor's Draft (Wednesday, 24 March)
• [Notifications] feedback requested on new Editor's Draft (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: Notifications (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: Notifications (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: Notifications (Friday, 5 February)
• Re: Notifications (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: Notifications (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: Notifications (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: Notifications (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: Notifications (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: Notifications (Wednesday, 3 February)

John Snelson

• XQuery WG Comments on Indexed Database API (Tuesday, 26 January)

Jonas Sicking

• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: Notifications (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: Web Sockets API, buffer handling after the connection is closed (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: [XHR2] new XMLHttpRequest(anon) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: [XHR2] new XMLHttpRequest(anon) (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: [XHR2] new XMLHttpRequest(anon) (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: FormData questions (Monday, 15 February)
• Re: FormData questions (Sunday, 14 February)
• FormData questions (Saturday, 13 February)
• Re: Notifications (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: Rechartering WebApp WG (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: Notifications (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: Rechartering WebApp WG (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: Notifications (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: element.onresize (Tuesday, 2 February)
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. (Monday, 1 February)
• Re: [xhr] events for async requests (Monday, 1 February)
• Re: [xhr] events for async requests (Monday, 1 February)
• Re: [xhr] events for async requests (Monday, 1 February)
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() (Monday, 1 February)
• Re: Seeking implementation data for CORS and UMP (Monday, 1 February)
• Re: [xhr] events for async requests (was: Re: [whatwg] Thread to run Web Socket feedback from the protocol ?) (Monday, 1 February)
• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing (Friday, 29 January)
• Re: localStorage Event (Thursday, 28 January)
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme (Thursday, 28 January)
• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing (Thursday, 28 January)
• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing (Thursday, 28 January)
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme (Wednesday, 27 January)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Detailed comments for the current draft (Wednesday, 27 January)
• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing (Wednesday, 27 January)
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. (Thursday, 21 January)
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2 (Wednesday, 20 January)
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. (Friday, 15 January)
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. (Friday, 15 January)
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. (Friday, 15 January)
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. (Wednesday, 13 January)
• Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of Uniform Messaging Policy spec; deadline January 19 (Wednesday, 13 January)
• Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of Uniform Messaging Policy spec; deadline January 19 (Wednesday, 13 January)
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD? (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: CfC: to publish FPWD of Selectors API Level 2; deadline January 15 (Saturday, 9 January)
• Re: Adopting postMessage and MessageChannel from HTML5? (Saturday, 9 January)
• Re: XHR LC comment: header encoding (Tuesday, 5 January)

Joseph Pecoraro

• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: [DataCache] Unhandled Cases in Networking Changes (Monday, 4 January)
• Re: [DataCache] General Comments and Correction for the New WD (Monday, 4 January)
• [DataCache] General Comments and Correction for the New WD (Friday, 1 January)
• Re: [DataCache] Event Handlers on DataCache (Friday, 1 January)
• Re: [DataCache] Unhandled Cases in Networking Changes (Friday, 1 January)
• Re: [DataCache] Updated Examples (Friday, 1 January)

João Eiras

• Re: [web databases] SQLStatementErrorCallback (Thursday, 25 March)
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call (Wednesday, 17 March)
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call (Monday, 8 March)
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call (Friday, 5 March)

Juan Lanus

• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. (Wednesday, 27 January)
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. (Tuesday, 26 January)
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. (Saturday, 23 January)

Julian Reschke

• Re: Last-Event-ID in http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/ (Tuesday, 2 March)
• Re: Last-Event-ID in http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/ (Tuesday, 2 March)
• Last-Event-ID in http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/ (Tuesday, 2 March)
• Re: [Uri-review] Review request: widget URI scheme (Friday, 26 February)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest send() Method Uploads On Inappropriate HTTP Protocols (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: [widgets] Applying Stylesheets to Resources (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: XHR HTTP method support, Re: XHR LC comments (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest specification lacks security considerations (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: XHR LC comment: header encoding (Monday, 1 February)
• Re: FYI: review of draft-abarth-mime-sniff-03 (Thursday, 21 January)
• Re: XHR LC comment: header encoding (Tuesday, 5 January)
• Re: XHR LC comment: header encoding (Monday, 4 January)
• Re: XHR LC comment: header encoding (Monday, 4 January)
• Re: XHR LC comment: header encoding (Monday, 4 January)

Kenneth Christiansen

• Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec (Friday, 26 March)
• Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec (Friday, 26 March)

Kenton Varda

• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() (Thursday, 4 February)

Kris Zyp

• Re: [IndexedDB] API feedback (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Detailed comments for the current draft (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2 (Tuesday, 2 February)
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2 (Wednesday, 27 January)

kuehne@trustable.de

• Re: Re: Issues with XML Dig Sig and XML Canonicalization (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Issues with XML Dig Sig and XML Canonicalization (Friday, 12 February)

Lachlan Hunt

• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme (Wednesday, 27 January)
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme (Wednesday, 27 January)
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme (Tuesday, 26 January)
• Re: CfC: to publish FPWD of Selectors API Level 2; deadline January 15 (Friday, 15 January)
• Re: Restart the group (Friday, 15 January)
• Re: Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD? (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: [selectors-api2] Should we keep the queryScopedSelector methods? (was: Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD?) (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD? (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD? (Sunday, 10 January)
• Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD? (Thursday, 7 January)

Larry Masinter

• FYI: review of draft-abarth-mime-sniff-03 (Wednesday, 20 January)

Lenny Rachitsky

• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing (Tuesday, 2 February)
• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing (Tuesday, 2 February)
• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing (Monday, 1 February)

lenny.rachitsky

• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing (Tuesday, 2 February)

Maciej Stachowiak

• Re: Items not listed as "new" in the draft charter (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: Items not listed as "new" in the draft charter (Monday, 29 March)
• Re: Items not listed as "new" in the draft charter (Monday, 29 March)
• Re: Items not listed as "new" in the draft charter (Monday, 29 March)
• Re: Items not listed as "new" in the draft charter (Friday, 26 March)
• Re: Items not listed as "new" in the draft charter (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: Items not listed as "new" in the draft charter (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: [widgets] Seeking pre-LCWD comments for View Modes Media Feature; deadline March 17 (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Items not listed as "new" in the draft charter (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName (Thursday, 18 March)
• Re: Last-Event-ID in http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/ (Tuesday, 2 March)
• Re: Last-Event-ID in http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/ (Tuesday, 2 March)
• Re: [XHR2] new XMLHttpRequest(anon) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: [XHR2] new XMLHttpRequest(anon) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: ISSUE-115 (xhr-referer): XHR does not specify what URL to use for Referer [XHR] (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName (Sunday, 14 February)
• Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: Rechartering WebApp WG (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest specification lacks security considerations (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest specification lacks security considerations (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: [UMP] Subsetting (was: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest()) (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: Window id - an idea to make multi page web application easier (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme (Monday, 1 February)
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme (Monday, 1 February)
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() (Monday, 1 February)
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme (Friday, 29 January)
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme (Wednesday, 27 January)
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme (Wednesday, 27 January)
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme (Tuesday, 26 January)
• Re: Interface names in IndexedDB (and WebSQLDatabase) (Friday, 22 January)
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2 (Tuesday, 19 January)
• Re: Adopting postMessage and MessageChannel from HTML5? (Thursday, 14 January)
• Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of Uniform Messaging Policy spec; deadline January 19 (Wednesday, 13 January)
• Re: [UMP] Proxy-Authorization (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: Adopting postMessage and MessageChannel from HTML5? (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: Adopting postMessage and MessageChannel from HTML5? (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: [UMP] Feedback on UMP from a quick read (Sunday, 10 January)
• Re: CfC: to publish FPWD of Selectors API Level 2; deadline January 15 (Saturday, 9 January)
• Re: [UMP] Feedback on UMP from a quick read (Saturday, 9 January)
• Re: Adopting postMessage and MessageChannel from HTML5? (Saturday, 9 January)

Marcin Hanclik

• Regrets, RE: [widgets] Draft minutes from 11 February 2010 voice conference (Wednesday, 17 February)
• RE: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 11 February 2010 voice conf (Thursday, 11 February)
• RE: [WARP] Use cases for local network access (Thursday, 4 February)
• [widgets][vmmf] clarifications (Thursday, 14 January)

Marcos Caceres

• Re: i18n comments: (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: i18n comments: (Monday, 29 March)
• Re: i18n comments: (Monday, 29 March)
• Re: i18n comments: (Monday, 29 March)
• Re: i18n comments: (was: [widgets] Span example) (Saturday, 27 March)
• Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec (Friday, 26 March)
• Re: Items not listed as "new" in the draft charter (Friday, 26 March)
• Re: Items not listed as "new" in the draft charter (Thursday, 25 March)
• Re: [widgets] Span example (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: [widgets] Span example (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme (Sunday, 21 March)
• Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec (Thursday, 18 March)
• Re: Issues with XML Dig Sig and XML Canonicalization; was Re: Rechartering WebApp WG (Wednesday, 17 March)
• Re: ACTION-401Ask WebApps to Review Taxonomy (Wednesday, 17 March)
• Re: [widgets] Span example (Wednesday, 17 March)
• Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec (Tuesday, 16 March)
• Re: [widgets] Span example (Tuesday, 16 March)
• Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec (Tuesday, 16 March)
• Re: VMMF — new version (Tuesday, 16 March)
• [widgets] dir and span tests (Tuesday, 16 March)
• Re: [widgets] dir and span elements (Tuesday, 16 March)
• Re: [widgets] dir and span elements (Wednesday, 10 March)
• Re: [widgets] dir and span elements (Saturday, 6 March)
• Re: [widgets] dir and span elements (Saturday, 6 March)
• Re: [widgets] dir and span elements (Saturday, 6 March)
• Re: [widgets] dir and span elements (Saturday, 6 March)
• Re: [widgets] Request for Comments: LCWD of Widget Access Request Policy spec; deadline 13-Jan-2010 (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: Information about latest specs for language tagging (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: [widgets] dir and span elements (Tuesday, 2 March)
• Re: [widgets] ITS in Widgets (Monday, 1 March)
• [widgets] dir and span elements (Friday, 26 February)
• [widgets] ITS in Widgets (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: [widgets-interface] Marking Widget as [NoInterfaceObject] (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: Issues with XML Dig Sig and XML Canonicalization (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: [widgets] TWI: comments (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: [widgets] Testing infrastructure for Widget Access Request Policy (WARP) spec (Monday, 15 February)
• Issues with XML Dig Sig and XML Canonicalization; was Re: Rechartering WebApp WG (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: [widgets-twi] window object (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: Rechartering WebApp WG (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: [widgets] TWI: comments (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: [widgets-twi] window object (Tuesday, 9 February)
• [widgets] API - openURL security considerations (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: [widgets-twi] window object (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: [widgets] TWI: comments (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: [widgets-twi] window object (Monday, 8 February)
• [widgets] Important Test Suite Updates (Friday, 5 February)
• Re: [widgets-twi] window object (Friday, 5 February)
• Re: [widgets] P&C: comments submitted after 1-Dec-2009 CR#2 publication (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: [widgets] P&C: comments submitted after 1-Dec-2009 CR#2 publication (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: [widgets] Null in P&C (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: One <feature>, multiple resources (Tuesday, 2 February)
• Re: [widgets] Null in P&C (Tuesday, 2 February)
• Re: One <feature>, multiple resources (Tuesday, 2 February)
• Re: [widgets] Null in P&C (Tuesday, 2 February)
• [widgets] Null in P&C (Tuesday, 2 February)
• Re: A Method for Writing Testable Conformance Clauses and its Applications (Was Re: Write up of test assertion extraction methodology) (Thursday, 21 January)
• Re: A Method for Writing Testable Conformance Clauses and its Applications (Was Re: Write up of test assertion extraction methodology) (Thursday, 21 January)
• Re: A Method for Writing Testable Conformance Clauses and its Applications (Was Re: Write up of test assertion extraction methodology) (Wednesday, 20 January)
• A Method for Writing Testable Conformance Clauses and its Applications (Was Re: Write up of test assertion extraction methodology) (Tuesday, 19 January)
• [widgets] P&C typo in 9.1.9. Rule for Parsing a Non-negative Integer (Tuesday, 19 January)
• Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of Uniform Messaging Policy spec; deadline January 19 (Wednesday, 13 January)
• Re: [widgets] feature: inconsistent behavior ? (Thursday, 7 January)
• Re: [widgets] white space handling (Thursday, 7 January)
• Re: [widgets] white space handling (Wednesday, 6 January)
• Re: [widgets] white space handling (Wednesday, 6 January)
• Re: [widgets] feature: inconsistent behavior ? (Wednesday, 6 January)
• Re: [widgets] feature: inconsistent behavior ? (Wednesday, 6 January)
• Re: [widgets] feature: inconsistent behavior ? (Wednesday, 6 January)
• Re: [widgets] feature: inconsistent behavior ? (Tuesday, 5 January)
• Re: [widgets] P&C simplifying some rules (editorial) (Tuesday, 5 January)
• Re: [widgets] features: default value for required (Tuesday, 5 January)
• Re: [widgets] duplicated feature elements ? (Tuesday, 5 January)
• Re: [widgets] duplicated feature elements ? (Tuesday, 5 January)

Mark S. Miller

• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) (Thursday, 4 March)
• [UMP] Subsetting (was: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest()) (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of Uniform Messaging Policy spec; deadline January 19 (Wednesday, 13 January)
• Re: [UMP] Server opt-in (Wednesday, 13 January)

Martin J. Dürst

• Re: i18n comments: (Monday, 29 March)

Mary Ellen Zurko

• Transition announcement: Third LC of wsc-ui (Tuesday, 9 March)

Michael Nordman

• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: FormData questions (Friday, 26 February)
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. (Thursday, 21 January)

Mike Wilson

• RE: [whatwg] Window id - a proposal to leverage session usage in webapplication (Thursday, 18 February)

Nikunj Mehta

• Re: [IndexedDB] Lots of small nits and clarifying questions (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2 (Saturday, 13 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] API feedback (Saturday, 13 March)
• [IndexedDB] Explaining Asynchronous event-style interface (Saturday, 13 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] API feedback (Saturday, 13 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Lots of small nits and clarifying questions (Saturday, 13 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Lots of small nits and clarifying questions (Monday, 1 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Detailed comments for the current draft (Monday, 1 February)
• Re: Some IndexedDB feedback (Monday, 1 February)
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2 (Monday, 1 February)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Detailed comments for the current draft (Monday, 1 February)
• Re: Interface names in IndexedDB (and WebSQLDatabase) (Wednesday, 27 January)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Detailed comments for the current draft (Tuesday, 26 January)
• Re: Interface names in IndexedDB (and WebSQLDatabase) (Friday, 22 January)
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2 (Wednesday, 20 January)
• Re: Re-introduction (Monday, 18 January)
• Re-introduction (Sunday, 17 January)
• Transition (Tuesday, 5 January)

Nikunj R. Mehta

• Re: [DataCache] General Comments and Correction for the New WD (Tuesday, 5 January)
• Re: [DataCache] Updated Examples (Tuesday, 5 January)
• Re: [DataCache] Unhandled Cases in Networking Changes (Monday, 4 January)
• Re: [DataCache] Remove or Replace a Local Server Handler? (Monday, 4 January)
• Re: [DataCache] General Comments and Correction for the New WD (Monday, 4 January)
• Re: [DataCache] "ready" CacheEvent and Related Questions (Friday, 1 January)
• Re: [DataCache] Event Handlers on DataCache (Friday, 1 January)
• [DataCache] Editor's draft now ready for WD publication (Friday, 1 January)
• Re: [DataCache] Updated Examples (Friday, 1 January)
• Re: [DataCache] Unhandled Cases in Networking Changes (Friday, 1 January)

Olli Pettay

• Websockets API / CloseEvent and readyState (Wednesday, 17 March)
• Re: WebSockets questions, bufferedAmount (Saturday, 20 February)
• Re: Web Sockets API, buffer handling after the connection is closed (Friday, 19 February)
• Web Sockets API, buffer handling after the connection is closed (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: Notifications (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: Notifications (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Notifications (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: element.onresize (Tuesday, 2 February)
• Re: element.onresize (Tuesday, 2 February)
• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing (Friday, 29 January)
• Re: localStorage Event (Thursday, 28 January)
• Re: localStorage Event (Thursday, 28 January)
• Re: localStorage Event (Thursday, 28 January)

Pablo Castro

• RE: [IndexedDB] Lots of small nits and clarifying questions (Tuesday, 30 March)
• RE: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) (Tuesday, 30 March)
• RE: [IndexedDB] Lots of small nits and clarifying questions (Tuesday, 30 March)
• RE: [IndexedDB] Detailed comments for the current draft (Wednesday, 3 February)
• RE: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2 (Tuesday, 2 February)
• [IndexedDB] Detailed comments for the current draft (Tuesday, 26 January)
• RE: IndexedDB and MVCC (Monday, 18 January)

Pedro Santos

• Re: [XHR] New api request (Monday, 1 February)
• [XHR] New api request (Friday, 29 January)
• XHR (Wednesday, 27 January)

Phillips, Addison

• RE: i18n comments: (Monday, 29 March)
• RE: [widgets] dir and span elements (Monday, 1 March)
• RE: [widgets] dir and span elements (Monday, 1 March)

Pierre-Antoine LaFayette

• Review request for icon URI scheme draft (Friday, 26 March)
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme (Sunday, 21 March)
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme (Sunday, 21 March)
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme (Monday, 1 February)
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme (Monday, 1 February)
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme (Friday, 29 January)
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme (Wednesday, 27 January)
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme (Wednesday, 27 January)
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme (Wednesday, 27 January)
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme (Wednesday, 27 January)
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme (Tuesday, 26 January)
• Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme (Sunday, 24 January)

Richard Ishida

• [widgets] Korean text corrupted (Friday, 26 March)
• i18n comments: (was: [widgets] Span example) (Friday, 26 March)
• RE: [widgets] Span example (Friday, 26 March)
• RE: [widgets] Span example (Tuesday, 16 March)
• [widgets] Span example (Tuesday, 16 March)
• RE: [widgets] dir and span elements (Friday, 12 March)
• RE: [widgets] dir and span elements (Thursday, 4 March)

Richard Zschech

• WebSocket API access to headers (Thursday, 25 February)

Robert O'Callahan

• Re: Notifications (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: Notifications (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: Notifications (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: Notifications (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme (Thursday, 28 January)
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. (Wednesday, 27 January)
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. (Sunday, 24 January)
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. (Friday, 15 January)

Robin Berjon

• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: [Notifications] feedback requested on new Editor's Draft (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: Items not listed as "new" in the draft charter (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: Items not listed as "new" in the draft charter (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for View Modes Media Feature; deadline March 17 (Wednesday, 10 March)
• Re: VMMF — new version (Wednesday, 10 March)
• Re: VMMF — new version (Wednesday, 10 March)
• Re: [WARP] comment on subdomains (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: [widgets] Request for Comments: LCWD of Widget Access Request Policy spec; deadline 13-Jan-2010 (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: [WARP] comment on subdomains (Thursday, 4 March)
• VMMF — new version (Thursday, 4 March)
• Review request: widget URI scheme (Thursday, 25 February)
• Re: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 11 February 2010 voice conf (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: Rechartering WebApp WG (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: [widgets] TWI: comments (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: [widgets-twi] window object (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: MPEG-U (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: [widgets-twi] window object (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: [widgets-twi] window object (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: [widgets] TWI: comments (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: MPEG-U (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of Uniform Messaging Policy spec; deadline January 19 (Wednesday, 13 January)
• Re: MPEG-U (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: MPEG-U (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: [widgets] white space handling (Thursday, 7 January)
• Re: [widgets] feature: inconsistent behavior ? (Thursday, 7 January)
• MPEG-U (Wednesday, 6 January)
• Re: [widgets] P&C simplifying some rules (editorial) (Wednesday, 6 January)
• Re: [widgets] feature: inconsistent behavior ? (Wednesday, 6 January)

Rokesh Jankie

• Re: Restart the group (Friday, 15 January)
• Restart the group (Friday, 15 January)
• Introducing Rokesh Jankie, for the Web Applications groups (Friday, 8 January)

Ryan Seddon

• Re: [Notifications] feedback requested on new Editor's Draft (Tuesday, 23 March)

Scott Cantor

• RE: [widgets] DigSig - proposed change to XML Signature Properties (Thursday, 7 January)

Scott Wilson

• Re: [widgets] Span example (Monday, 22 March)
• [widgets] Apache Wookie's W3C Widget parser now available as standalone Java library (Sunday, 7 March)
• Re: [widgets] Request for Comments: LCWD of Widget Access Request Policy spec; deadline 13-Jan-2010 (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: [widgets] dir and span elements (Tuesday, 2 March)
• Re: [widgets] dir and span elements (Monday, 1 March)
• Re: [widgets] dir and span elements (Monday, 1 March)
• Re: [widgets] ITS in Widgets (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: [widgets] API - openURL security considerations (Saturday, 20 February)
• Re: [widgets] API - openURL security considerations (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: Social APIs (was: Rechartering WebApp WG) (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: Social APIs (was: Rechartering WebApp WG) (Saturday, 13 February)
• Re: Rechartering WebApp WG (Saturday, 13 February)
• Re: Rechartering WebApp WG (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: Rechartering WebApp WG (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: Rechartering WebApp WG (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: [widgets] TWI: comments (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: [widgets-twi] window object (Tuesday, 9 February)
• [widgets] TWI: Fixes to test cases (Thursday, 28 January)
• [widgets] TWI test case errors (Wednesday, 20 January)
• Re: A Method for Writing Testable Conformance Clauses and its Applications (Was Re: Write up of test assertion extraction methodology) (Wednesday, 20 January)
• Re: [widgets] P&C simplifying some rules (editorial) (Wednesday, 6 January)
• Re: [widgets] feature: inconsistent behavior ? (Wednesday, 6 January)
• Re: [widgets] P&C simplifying some rules (editorial) (Wednesday, 6 January)

Sean Hogan

• Re: Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD? (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD? (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD? (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD? (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD? (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD? (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD? (Sunday, 10 January)

Sebastian Andersson

• Re: Feedback on WebSocket API, Editor's Draft 13 November 2009. (Monday, 1 February)
• Re: Feedback on WebSocket API, Editor's Draft 13 November 2009. (Sunday, 31 January)

Sebastian Hennebrueder

• Re: Window id - an idea to make multi page web application easier (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: Window id - an idea to make multi page web application easier (Friday, 29 January)
• Window id - an idea to make multi page web application easier (Monday, 18 January)

Sebastián Ramírez

• Re: [XHR2] term "flag", for authors (Wednesday, 24 March)
• [XHR2] term "flag", for authors (Wednesday, 24 March)

Shane Harrelson

• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call (Saturday, 13 March)
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call (Saturday, 13 March)
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call (Friday, 12 March)

Shawn Wilsher

• Re: [IndexedDB] Exceptions on IndexedDatabaseRequest.open (Wednesday, 31 March)
• [IndexedDB] Opening a database with a different description (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Explaining Asynchronous event-style interface (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Detailed comments for the current draft (Thursday, 25 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Explaining Asynchronous event-style interface (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Explaining Asynchronous event-style interface (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] IDBRequest Interface Questions (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] IDBRequest Interface Questions (Monday, 22 March)
• [IndexedDB] IDBRequest Interface Questions (Tuesday, 16 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] API feedback (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) (Friday, 12 March)

Sigbjorn Finne

• Re: Adopting postMessage and MessageChannel from HTML5? (Saturday, 9 January)
• Re: Adopting postMessage and MessageChannel from HTML5? (Saturday, 9 January)

Simon Fraser

• Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec (Thursday, 18 March)

Simon Pieters

• Re: [widgets] Null in P&C (Tuesday, 2 February)

Stephen Jolly

• Re: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 11 February 2010 voice conf (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: [WARP] Use cases for local network access (Thursday, 4 February)
• [WARP] Use cases for local network access (Tuesday, 2 February)
• Re: [WARP] Extending access to local network resources (Thursday, 21 January)
• [WARP] Extending access to local network resources (Thursday, 14 January)

Steven Pemberton

• Re: [widgets] Draft agenda for 25 February 2010 voice conference (Wednesday, 24 February)

SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)

• Handling of locally-served files via XHR and as iframe source (Friday, 19 March)
• RE: Event handlers - Pointer Devices (Saturday, 6 March)
• RE: Event handlers - Pointer Devices (Thursday, 4 March)
• RE: Event handlers - Pointer Devices (Thursday, 4 March)

Tab Atkins Jr.

• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for View Modes Media Feature; deadline March 17 (Wednesday, 10 March)
• Re: [selectors-api] comments on Selectors API Level 2 (Thursday, 21 January)
• Re: Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD? (Monday, 11 January)

Thomas Broyer

• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() (Thursday, 4 February)

Thomas Roessler

• Re: [WARP] comment on subdomains (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: [widgets] API - openURL security considerations (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: Rechartering WebApp WG (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest specification lacks security considerations (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest specification lacks security considerations (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest specification lacks security considerations (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: [widgets] Null in P&C (Tuesday, 2 February)
• [XHR] XMLHttpRequest specification lacks security considerations (Tuesday, 19 January)
• [XHR] same-origin request event rules are underspecified (Tuesday, 19 January)

timeless

• Re: VMMF — new version (Wednesday, 10 March)
• Re: [widgets] API - openURL security considerations (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme (Monday, 1 February)

Travis Leithead

• [FastMutation] Updated Proposal on the DOM L3 Events Wiki (Wednesday, 27 January)

Tyler Close

• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() (Tuesday, 2 February)
• Re: [UMP] Server opt-in (Friday, 15 January)
• Re: [UMP] Server opt-in (Thursday, 14 January)
• Re: [UMP] Proxy-Authorization (Wednesday, 13 January)
• Re: [UMP] Server opt-in (Wednesday, 13 January)
• Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of Uniform Messaging Policy spec; deadline January 19 (Wednesday, 13 January)
• Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of Uniform Messaging Policy spec; deadline January 19 (Wednesday, 13 January)
• Re: [UMP] Server opt-in (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: [UMP] Server opt-in (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: [UMP] Server opt-in (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: [UMP] Proxy-Authorization (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: [UMP] Proxy-Authorization (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: [UMP] Proxy-Authorization (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: [UMP] Feedback on UMP from a quick read (Sunday, 10 January)
• Re: [UMP] Proxy-Authorization (Sunday, 10 January)
• Re: [UMP] Feedback on UMP from a quick read (Saturday, 9 January)
• Re: [UMP] Feedback on UMP from a quick read (Saturday, 9 January)
• Re: [UMP] Feedback on UMP from a quick read (Saturday, 9 January)
• Re: [UMP] Feedback on UMP from a quick read (Saturday, 9 January)
• Re: [UMP] Feedback on UMP from a quick read (Saturday, 9 January)
• Re: [UMP] Feedback on UMP from a quick read (Friday, 8 January)
• Re: [UMP] Feedback on UMP from a quick read (Friday, 8 January)
• [UMP] A declarative version of "Uniform Messaging Policy" (Friday, 8 January)
• Re: [UMP] updated editor's draft of "Uniform Messaging Policy" on W3C site (Wednesday, 6 January)
• [UMP] updated editor's draft of "Uniform Messaging Policy" on W3C site (Tuesday, 5 January)

Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker

• ISSUE-116: Need to flesh out the security considerations for the openURL method in the Widget Interface spec (Thursday, 18 March)
• ISSUE-115 (xhr-referer): XHR does not specify what URL to use for Referer [XHR] (Wednesday, 3 February)
• ISSUE-114 (CORS-credentials): CORS does not define the effect of the credentials flag in sufficient detail [CORS] (Wednesday, 3 February)
• ISSUE-113 (resize): Clarify when resize events fire [DOM3 Events] (Sunday, 31 January)

Yves Lafon

• Re: [WARP] comment on subdomains (Monday, 29 March)

Zhiheng Wang

• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing (Friday, 19 February)
• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing (Tuesday, 2 February)
• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing (Tuesday, 2 February)
• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing (Friday, 29 January)
• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing (Thursday, 28 January)
• [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing (Wednesday, 27 January)

イアンフェッティ

• Re: Notifications (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: Notifications (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: Notifications (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: Notifications (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme (Monday, 1 February)
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme (Friday, 29 January)
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme (Friday, 29 January)

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 March 2010 22:56:37 UTC