- From: Jared Morse <jarcoal@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:22:13 -0800
- To: Olli@pettay.fi
- Cc: public-webapps@w3.org
- Message-ID: <19e6d9a31001281422s27510699q14fbcfb44844e462@mail.gmail.com>
Perhaps I am mistaken, but I believe you would still have to go around and add that trigger to all the places the value is changed from. -J On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi>wrote: > On 1/28/10 11:57 PM, Jared Morse wrote: > >> Even though it occurs on the same document, doesn't mean loosely coupled >> code can't benefit from it. >> >> Imagine if each time you added a feature to a web app that depended on >> knowing a current value from the storage, you'd have to go around to all >> the places that value is changed and add some code to alert your new >> code. If storage events triggered on the same document, all you would >> have to do is set a listener. >> > > If you really need this behavior, you can always dispatch your own event > to the window when you change the data. > > > -Olli > > > >> -J >> >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi >> <mailto:Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi>> wrote: >> >> On 1/28/10 9:34 PM, Jared Morse wrote: >> >> Hi, I have a concern about the web storage event spec >> (http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/). >> >> The spec states: >> "When the setItem(), removeItem(), and clear() methods are >> called on a >> Storage object x that is associated with a local storage area, >> if the >> methods did something, then in every HTMLDocument object whose >> Window >> object's localStorage attribute's Storage object is associated >> with the >> same storage area, other than x, a storage event must be fired..." >> >> My concern lies with the "other than x" part. Unless I'm missing >> something, these events would be even more useful if they also >> fired in >> the HTMLDocument that initially made the storage call. >> >> >> The page which is changing storage object knows already that the >> storage object is being changed. Why would it need explicit >> notification (event) about that? >> >> >> -Olli >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks for your time. >> >> -Jared >> >> >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 28 January 2010 22:22:46 UTC