- From: Jeremy Orlow <jorlow@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:16:34 +0000
- To: public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
- Cc: Scott Hess <shess@google.com>
- Message-ID: <5dd9e5c51002180616n6d701b95iabb28ca1b954eea8@mail.gmail.com>
In addition to looking at the UA side of the IndexedDB AI, I've been talking to our web apps teams about it to get their initial impressions. I'm going to batch most of the feedback together in another email, but this is a big enough feature and important enough to all of those teams that I wanted to keep this in its own thread. All of the Google apps put a large emphasis on search. For example, the search within Gmail, reader, docs, wave, etc. In fact, I actually can't (off the top of my head) think of a Google app that we'd want to work offline that doesn't put a heavy emphasis on search. Thus search is a pretty important part of the offline experience for any of our apps. In Gears (and SQLite) there's full text search. This did a decent job of enabling offline search and providing a decent experience to offline users. Full text search is a pretty large beast though, and carries with it a lot of baggage...much of it tied in closely with SQL. Doing full text search completely in JavaScript (even with IndexedDB) is almost certainly not manageable for anything other than trivial amounts of data. (Definitely not one of our email accounts.) Implementing full text search in JS with Inverted indexes<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_index> doing the heavy lifting should be practical though. As such, we'd like to propose Inverted Indexes be added to the spec. Anyhow, I'd like to know what concerns/objections others might have to adding this to IndexedDB. From some f2f conversations at TPAC, it sounded like there was general support at a high level, but I'm sure there will be many details to hammer out. I think we (Google) would be happy to come up with a concrete proposal if that'd be helpful. Thoughts? Thanks! Jeremy P.S. Scott Hess knows _way_ more about the details of full text search than I do, so I've cc'ed him on this.
Received on Thursday, 18 February 2010 14:17:26 UTC