- From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:15:38 +0100
- To: David Rogers <david.rogers@omtp.org>
- CC: Arthur Barstow <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Hi David, Art, David Rogers wrote: > Thanks for that Art, I agree with you, that would also be the OMTP view. Don't get me wrong: that's why I said "I'd personally like to see" and not "It is Opera's position that..."; and made tried to make it clear that "if other implementers feel confident that the spec is solid enough to become a standard, then onwards we go :)". > > -----Original Message----- > From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:Art.Barstow@nokia.com] > Sent: 03 February 2010 15:55 > To: Marcos Caceres; David Rogers > Cc: public-webapps > Subject: Re: [widgets] P&C: comments submitted after 1-Dec-2009 CR#2 > publication > > On Feb 3, 2010, at 10:48 AM, ext David Rogers wrote: > >> Are there formal points (e.g. 100,000 users etc.) at which this is >> gated? I'm assuming that some organisations would wait until it >> reached PR before implementing so your proposal could be somewhat >> chicken and egg related. > > Each CR defines its own "exit criteria". For this spec it is: > > [[ > http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/CR-widgets-20091201/#sotd > > The Web Applications (WebApps) Working Group expects to request that > the Director advance this document to Proposed Recommendation once > the Working Group has demonstrated at least two interoperable > implementations (interoperable meaning at least two implementations > that pass each mandatory test in the [P&C-Test-Suite]). The WebApps > Working Group expects to show these implementations as part of an > Implementation Report and advance to Proposed Recommendation after 24 > January 2010. > ]] > > Based on this criteria and what has been captured in the > Implementation Report, it appears the exit criteria in the CR has > been met: > > http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/imp-report/ > > -Art Barstow > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 3 February 2010 16:16:19 UTC