- From: Jian Li <jianli@chromium.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:57:28 -0700
- To: arun@mozilla.com, Web Applications Working Group WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 23 March 2010 23:57:56 UTC
Hi, We probably have already discussed this: adding the Content-Disposition header into the response when reading File.urn resource. But since this is not currently documented in the spec, I want to ping you guys to make sure we are all in the same page. When the header "Content-Dispositon: attachment" is added, the UA could either trigger the inline replacement or initiate the download depending on the different element type. For IMG/INPUT/VIDEO/SCRIPT/LINK, our UA is doing the replacement inline. For others like IFRAME/LOCATION, our UA will initiate the download. Are these behaviors you also expect for your UA? In addition, do we want to add the file name to the C-D header? I've heard that there is a discussion on setting C-D header pragmatically. Do we want to go along this way? Thanks, Jian
Received on Tuesday, 23 March 2010 23:57:56 UTC