- From: Darin Fisher <darin@chromium.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:56:02 -0700
- To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Cc: Michael Nordman <michaeln@google.com>, Web Applications Working Group WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, Eric Uhrhane <ericu@google.com>
- Message-ID: <r2rbd8f24d21003301656zc7fa86dak6d90117bbf4a9efb@mail.gmail.com>
The only way to get a FileWriter at the moment is from <input type="saveas">. What is desired is a way to simulate the load of a resource with Content-Disposition: attachment that would trigger the browser's download manager. -Darin On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: > What's the use case for specifying the Content-Disposition mime type. > The ones I've heard so far seems better solved using the FileWriter > [1] API. > > [1] http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/file-system/file-writer.html > > / Jonas > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Michael Nordman <michaeln@google.com> > wrote: > > There is more than just the mime type when dealing with the URLs. > > There at least two content headers of interest, Content-Type > > and Content-Disposition. > > Whatever mechanism involved should allow for both of these content > headers > > to be set > > by the web application. > > > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Darin Fisher <darin@chromium.org> > wrote: > >> > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Darin Fisher <darin@chromium.org> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > Apologies if this has been discussed before, but I'm curious why > URN > >> >> > is > >> >> > not > >> >> > a property of Blob. It seems like it would be useful to be able to > >> >> > load > >> >> > a > >> >> > slice of a File. For example, this could be used by an application > >> >> > to > >> >> > fetch > >> >> > all of its subresources out of a single file. > >> >> > >> >> IIRC originally it was placed on File since Blobs do not have a > >> >> content type. However I think there is general agreement that it > >> >> should be moved to Blob. > >> >> > >> >> However it would be great to be able to assign a content type to a > >> >> Blob. Possibly slice() could take a optional argument. > >> >> > >> > > >> > Adding an optional parameter to slice() sounds attractive indeed. > >> > BlobBuilder [1] should probably also have such an optional argument. > >> > >> Indeed! > >> > >> / Jonas > >> > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 30 March 2010 23:56:32 UTC