public-lod@w3.org from November 2010 by date

Tuesday, 30 November 2010

• Announcement: First IAOA Summer Institute in Applied Ontology, Tuscany, Italy, July 17-23, 2011 Obrst, Leo J.
• Re: Looking for metalex ontology Bernard Vatant
• Re: Looking for metalex ontology Rinke Hoekstra

Monday, 29 November 2010

• Re: Looking for metalex ontology ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program
• Re: Looking for metalex ontology Tim Berners-Lee
• Looking for metalex ontology Bernard Vatant
• RDF Extension for Google Refine Maali, Fadi
• DBTropes.org, more sameAs links Malte Kiesel
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? James Leigh
• Linked Data Hackdays, Bristol, 13-14 January, 2011 Damian Steer
• Re: Simpler alternative of Linked Data semantics (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Simpler alternative of Linked Data semantics (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) Jiří Procházka

Sunday, 28 November 2010

• Re: Simpler alternative of Linked Data semantics (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) Kingsley Idehen
• Re: SPARQL Web Pages (aka UISPIN) Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Toby Inkster
• Simpler alternative of Linked Data semantics (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) Jiří Procházka
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Kingsley Idehen
• Facebook OpenGraphProtocol (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Jiří Procházka
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Giovanni Tummarello
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? William Waites

Saturday, 27 November 2010

• Call for Contribution - Journals and Conferences Robert C. Hsu
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Richard Light
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Kingsley Idehen

Friday, 26 November 2010

• Re: Is 303 really necessary? William Waites
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? David Booth
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? David Booth
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Nathan
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Bob Ferris

Thursday, 25 November 2010

• CfP: Position Papers for Linked Data Session at Future Internet Assembly Sören Auer
• Re: Failed to port datastore to RDF, will go Mongo Dave Reynolds

Wednesday, 24 November 2010

• Re: Failed to port datastore to RDF, will go Mongo Friedrich Lindenberg

Thursday, 25 November 2010

• Re: Failed to port datastore to RDF, will go Mongo Kingsley Idehen

Wednesday, 24 November 2010

• Re: Failed to port datastore to RDF, will go Mongo William Waites
• Re: Failed to port datastore to RDF, will go Mongo Toby Inkster
• CfP: Applied Ontology Special Issue on Modularity in Ontologies Joana Hois
• Re: FW: Failed to port datastore to RDF, will go Mongo Kingsley Idehen
• Re: FW: Failed to port datastore to RDF, will go Mongo Ben O'Steen
• Re: FW: Failed to port datastore to RDF, will go Mongo Juan Sequeda
• Re: FW: Failed to port datastore to RDF, will go Mongo Kingsley Idehen
• Re: linked data about the W3C? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: linked data about the W3C? Karl Dubost
• Re: linked data about the W3C? Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: FW: Failed to port datastore to RDF, will go Mongo Ben O'Steen
• Re: FW: Failed to port datastore to RDF, will go Mongo Kingsley Idehen
• Re: linked data about the W3C? Karl Dubost
• Re: linked data about the W3C? Jie Bao
• Re: FW: Failed to port datastore to RDF, will go Mongo Aldo Bucchi
• Re: FW: Failed to port datastore to RDF, will go Mongo Aldo Bucchi
• Re: FW: Failed to port datastore to RDF, will go Mongo William Waites
• Re: FW: Failed to port datastore to RDF, will go Mongo Kingsley Idehen
• FW: Failed to port datastore to RDF, will go Mongo William Waites
• Re: linked data about the W3C? Michael Hausenblas
• linked data about the W3C? Pierre-Antoine Champin

Monday, 22 November 2010

• Re: [open-bibliography] ANN: British National Bibliography William Waites
• Re: [open-bibliography] ANN: British National Bibliography Richard Light
• Re: ANN: British National Bibliography Kingsley Idehen
• Re: [open-bibliography] ANN: British National Bibliography William Waites
• Re: [open-bibliography] ANN: British National Bibliography Richard Light
• Re: [open-bibliography] ANN: British National Bibliography Peter Murray-Rust
• RE: [open-bibliography] ANN: British National Bibliography Deliot, Corine
• Re: [open-bibliography] ANN: British National Bibliography Richard Light
• Re: [open-bibliography] ANN: British National Bibliography Peter Murray-Rust
• Re: ANN: British National Bibliography William Waites
• Re: ANN: British National Bibliography Richard Light
• ANN: British National Bibliography William Waites
• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? Leigh Dodds
• Re: Making Linked Data Fun Kingsley Idehen

Sunday, 21 November 2010

• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? Toby Inkster
• Re: Making Linked Data Fun Sarven Capadisli
• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? Paul Michelotti
• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? Melvin Carvalho
• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? Melvin Carvalho
• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? Toby Inkster
• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program
• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? Toby Inkster
• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? Toby Inkster
• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? mike amundsen
• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? Barry Norton
• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? Damian Steer
• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? William Waites
• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? Melvin Carvalho
• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? Melvin Carvalho
• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? mike amundsen
• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? Melvin Carvalho

Saturday, 20 November 2010

• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? Toby Inkster
• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? Nathan
• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? Melvin Carvalho
• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? Melvin Carvalho
• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? mike amundsen
• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? Toby Inkster
• Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? Melvin Carvalho
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Kingsley Idehen

Friday, 19 November 2010

• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Nathan
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? David Booth
• Re: A Direct Mapping of Relational Data to RDF Juan Sequeda
• Re: AW: Making Linked Data Fun Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Making Linked Data Fun Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Making Linked Data Fun Aldo Bucchi
• AW: Making Linked Data Fun Peter Haase
• Re: Making Linked Data Fun John Erickson
• Re: Making Linked Data Fun Nathan
• Re: Making Linked Data Fun Aldo Bucchi
• Making Linked Data Fun Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Kingsley Idehen

Thursday, 18 November 2010

• Re: Is 303 really necessary? David Booth
• A Direct Mapping of Relational Data to RDF Juan Sequeda

Wednesday, 17 November 2010

• Re: Role of URI and HTTP in Linked Data David Booth
• Re: A(nother) Guide to Publishing Linked Data Without Redirects Kjetil Kjernsmo
• Linked Open Data Hackathon in Oslo, Norway Kjetil Kjernsmo
• Re: data.gov.uk ontologies Percy Enrique Rivera Salas
• Re: data.gov.uk ontologies Dave Reynolds

Tuesday, 16 November 2010

• ANN: The Tickets Ontology for Concerts, Airfare, Museums, etc. Martin Hepp
• Re: data.gov.uk ontologies William Waites
• Re: data.gov.uk ontologies Percy Enrique Rivera Salas
• Re: Ookaboo does #it Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Linked Data Thesaurus online Angelo Veltens
• Re: data.gov.uk ontologies Dave Reynolds
• Ookaboo does #it Paul Houle
• Reminder: JURIX 2010 Call for Participation Rinke Hoekstra

Monday, 15 November 2010

• data.gov.uk ontologies Percy Enrique Rivera Salas
• data.gov.uk ontologies Percy Enrique Rivera Salas
• 1st CfP: 11th International Conference on Web Engineering (ICWE 2011) Sören Auer

Sunday, 14 November 2010

• Re: Semantic Ambiguity William Waites

Saturday, 13 November 2010

• Re: What is a URL? And What is a URI Kingsley Idehen

Friday, 12 November 2010

• Re: What is a URL? And What is a URI Patrick Durusau
• Re: Google Refine 2.0 KangHao Lu (Kenny)
• LIMES Axel Ngonga
• Re: What is a URL? And What is a URI Kingsley Idehen
• Re: survey: who uses the triple foaf:name rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:label? Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: survey: who uses the triple foaf:name rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:label? KangHao Lu (Kenny)
• Re: survey: who uses the triple foaf:name rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:label? KangHao Lu (Kenny)
• Re: survey: who uses the triple foaf:name rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:label? Toby Inkster
• Re: What is a URL? And What is a URI Patrick Durusau
• One Week Countdown to submit for WIMS'11 Conference Rajendra Akerkar
• Full-time PhD studentship in Semantic Web and Linked Data Christopher Brewster
• Open Positions at Gnowsis.com Bernhard Schandl
• Re: Google Refine 2.0 Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Google Refine 2.0 David Huynh
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 Lars Heuer
• Re: Google Refine 2.0 David Huynh
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Semantic Ambiguity Kingsley Idehen
• Re: What is a URL? And What is a URI Kingsley Idehen
• RE: survey: who uses the triple foaf:name rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:label? Gong Cheng
• Re: Google Refine 2.0 Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Semantic Ambiguity Henry Story
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 Lars Heuer
• Semantic Ambiguity William Waites
• Re: What is a URL? And What is a URI Patrick Durusau
• Re: Google Refine 2.0 Leigh Dodds
• Re: Google Refine 2.0 Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 Kingsley Idehen
• Re: What is a URL? And What is a URI Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Google Refine 2.0 Leigh Dodds
• Re: What is a URL? And What is a URI Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 Lars Heuer
• Re: survey: who uses the triple foaf:name rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:label? Bernard Vatant
• Linked Data Thesaurus online (was: Re: synonym / thesaurus data) Angelo Veltens
• Re: survey: who uses the triple foaf:name rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:label? Giovanni Tummarello
• survey: who uses the triple foaf:name rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:label? Dan Brickley
• Re: What is a URL? And What is a URI Patrick Durusau
• Re: What is a URL? And What is a URI Dave Reynolds

Thursday, 11 November 2010

• Re: [ontolog-forum] Model Semantics, Representation Syntax, and Systems Integration Kingsley Idehen
• Google Refine 2.0 David Huynh
• Re: Google Refine 2.0 David Huynh
• Re: [ontolog-forum] Model Semantics, Representation Syntax, and Systems Integration Kingsley Idehen
• Re: RDB to RDF & ontology terms reuse Ted Thibodeau Jr
• Re: Google Refine 2.0 dfhuynh@csail.mit.edu
• Is disambiguation really necessary? (was Is 303 really necessary?) Jason Borro
• Re: Role of URI and HTTP in Linked Data Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Google Refine 2.0 John Sheridan
• Re: Google Refine 2.0 John Sheridan
• Re: Role of URI and HTTP in Linked Data Pat Hayes
• Re: Role of URI and HTTP in Linked Data Pat Hayes
• Re: Google Refine 2.0 Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Google Refine 2.0 dfhuynh@csail.mit.edu
• Re: What is a URL? And What is a URI Kingsley Idehen
• What is a URL? And What is a URI Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Rough draft poem: Document what art thou? Nathan
• Rough draft poem: Document what art thou? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Role of URI and HTTP in Linked Data Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Role of URI and HTTP in Linked Data Nathan
• Re: Google Refine 2.0 Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Google Refine 2.0 David Huynh
• Re: Role of URI and HTTP in Linked Data Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Role of URI and HTTP in Linked Data Robert Sanderson
• Re: A(nother) Guide to Publishing Linked Data Without Redirects David Wood
• Re: A(nother) Guide to Publishing Linked Data Without Redirects Nathan
• Re: Role of URI and HTTP in Linked Data Nathan
• Re: Role of URI and HTTP in Linked Data Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Role of URI and HTTP in Linked Data Nathan
• Re: Role of URI and HTTP in Linked Data David Booth
• Re: A(nother) Guide to Publishing Linked Data Without Redirects Kingsley Idehen
• Re: A(nother) Guide to Publishing Linked Data Without Redirects David Wood
• Re: A(nother) Guide to Publishing Linked Data Without Redirects Kingsley Idehen
• Re: A(nother) Guide to Publishing Linked Data Without Redirects Richard Light
• SAMT 2010 - CALL FOR PARTICIPATION Susanne Thierfelder
• Re: Role of URI and HTTP in Linked Data Jiří Procházka
• Re: A(nother) Guide to Publishing Linked Data Without Redirects David Wood
• Re: A(nother) Guide to Publishing Linked Data Without Redirects Giovanni Tummarello
• Re: A(nother) Guide to Publishing Linked Data Without Redirects Harry Halpin
• Re: clarification on the use of fragments Nathan

Wednesday, 10 November 2010

• Re: clarification on the use of fragments Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 Toby Inkster
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 Bradley Allen
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 Toby Inkster
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 Bradley Allen
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 Bradley Allen
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 Toby Inkster
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 Bradley Allen
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 Lars Heuer
• Re: clarification on the use of fragments Nathan
• Re: Role of URI and HTTP in Linked Data Nathan
• Re: clarification on the use of fragments Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: A(nother) Guide to Publishing Linked Data Without Redirects Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Model Semantics, Representation Syntax, and Systems Integration Kingsley Idehen
• A(nother) Guide to Publishing Linked Data Without Redirects David Wood
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 Nathan
• Re: clarification on the use of fragments Nathan
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 Nathan
• Re: Model Semantics, Representation Syntax, and Systems Integration Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 Bradley Allen
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Role of URI and HTTP in Linked Data Jiří Procházka
• Re: Model Semantics, Representation Syntax, and Systems Integration Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 Lars Heuer
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 Nathan
• Re: clarification on the use of fragments Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 Lars Heuer
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 Bradley Allen
• Re: Model Semantics, Representation Syntax, and Systems Integration mike amundsen
• clarification on the use of fragments Nathan
• Re: Model Semantics, Representation Syntax, and Systems Integration Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Model Semantics, Representation Syntax, and Systems Integration Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 Nathan
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 Bradley Allen
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 Nathan
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 Kingsley Idehen
• Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 Lars Heuer
• Re: Model Semantics, Representation Syntax, and Systems Integration mike amundsen
• Re: Model Semantics, Representation Syntax, and Systems Integration Kingsley Idehen
• Model Semantics, Representation Syntax, and Systems Integration Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Kjetil Kjernsmo
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) Toby Inkster
• Re: Role of URI and HTTP in Linked Data Nathan
• Role of URI and HTTP in Linked Data Jiří Procházka
• Re: RDB to RDF & ontology terms reuse Christian Rivas
• Re: RDB to RDF & ontology terms reuse Ted Thibodeau Jr
• Re: Integrating Disparate Information Systems Alan Ruttenberg

Tuesday, 9 November 2010

• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) Kingsley Idehen
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) Kingsley Idehen
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) joel sachs
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) joel sachs
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) joel sachs
• Re: subjects as literals Nathan
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) Nathan
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) Kingsley Idehen
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) Kingsley Idehen
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) joel sachs
• Re: Tabulator? Re: More browsers for ISWC 2010 data? Tim Berners-Lee
• Integrating Disparate Information Systems Kingsley Idehen
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) Kingsley Idehen
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) Nathan
• What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) Kingsley Idehen
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Lars Heuer
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) Nathan
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Dave Reynolds
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) Ian Davis
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) Nathan

Monday, 8 November 2010

• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Lars Heuer

Tuesday, 9 November 2010

• RE: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) Pete Johnston
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (dealing with ambiguity) Tore Eriksson
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates Toby Inkster
• class level mappings inferred from BTC2009 data A.Nikolov

Monday, 8 November 2010

• Re: Is 303 really necessary? David Booth
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates Tore Eriksson
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Dave Reynolds
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (dealing with ambiguity) David Booth
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? David Booth
• Re: Tabulator? Re: More browsers for ISWC 2010 data? Adrian Walker
• Tabulator? Re: More browsers for ISWC 2010 data? Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Toby Inkster
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Norman Gray
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? David Booth
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? David Booth
• wdrs:describedby = @rel describedby. Erratum published Phil Archer
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work Kingsley Idehen
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates Kingsley Idehen
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) Ian Davis
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates Toby Inkster
• Re: More browsers for ISWC 2010 data? Denny Vrandecic
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Toby Inkster
• Re: Publishing Linked Data without Redirects Ian Davis
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work Dave Reynolds
• Re: Publishing Linked Data without Redirects Phil Archer
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work Phil Archer
• Publishing Linked Data without Redirects Ian Davis
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Toby Inkster

Sunday, 7 November 2010

• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work John Sheridan
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work John Sheridan

Monday, 8 November 2010

• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (dealing with ambiguity) Tore Eriksson
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (dealing with ambiguity) David Booth
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Multiple things described in a single document) David Booth
• Linked Data gathering today Olaf Hartig
• Re: [foaf-dev] EON - event of note Raphaël Troncy
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work Tore Eriksson
• Re: More browsers for ISWC 2010 data? Jie Bao
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates Peter DeVries
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work Hugh Glaser

Sunday, 7 November 2010

• Re: [foaf-dev] EON - event of note Toby Inkster
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work Kingsley Idehen
• Re: [foaf-dev] EON - event of note Robert Sanderson
• Re: [foaf-dev] EON - event of note Toby Inkster
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work Ian Davis
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work Phil Archer
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work Kingsley Idehen
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work Kingsley Idehen
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates Egon Willighagen
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work Bill Roberts
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work Niklas Lindström
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates Kingsley Idehen
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work John Sheridan
• Re: [foaf-dev] EON - event of note Jörn Hees
• RE: [foaf-dev] EON - event of note Michael Schneider
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work Niklas Lindström
• Re: Hash vs Slash in relation to the 303 vs 200 debate (was: Is 303 really necessary - demo) Ian Davis
• More browsers for ISWC 2010 data? Jie Bao

Saturday, 6 November 2010

• Fw: [foaf-dev] EON - event of note Toby Inkster
• Re: Hash vs Slash in relation to the 303 vs 200 debate (was: Is 303 really necessary - demo) Toby Inkster
• Re: wdrs:describedby Kingsley Idehen
• POWDER Fix on wdrs:describedby (was Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work) Phil Archer
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Norman Gray
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? David Booth
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work Kingsley Idehen
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work Bill Roberts
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work Kingsley Idehen
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work Kingsley Idehen
• Extended deadline IUI2011 Workshop: Visual Interfaces to the Social and Semantic Web (VISSW 2011) Thai, Vinhtuan
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work Nathan
• Hash vs Slash in relation to the 303 vs 200 debate (was: Is 303 really necessary - demo) Ian Davis
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work Ian Davis
• Visual Backchannel for ISWC 2010 (Twitter Visualization) Jie Bao

Friday, 5 November 2010

• Re: RDB to RDF & ontology terms reuse Christian Rivas
• Re: RDB to RDF & ontology terms reuse Leigh Dodds
• RDB to RDF & ontology terms reuse Christian Rivas
• Re: RDB to RDF & ontology terms reuse Christian Rivas
• RDB to RDF & ontology terms reuse Christian Rivas
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work: But maybe it can be simpler? Nathan
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work: But maybe it can be simpler? Pat Hayes
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work: But maybe it can be simpler? Nathan
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work: But maybe it can be simpler? Nathan
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work: But maybe it can be simpler? Mike Kelly
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates Norman Gray
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates Nathan
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work: But maybe it can be simpler? Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Hugh Glaser
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates Hugh Glaser
• wdrs:describedby Phil Archer
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work: But maybe it can be simpler? Nathan
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Nathan
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates Nathan
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work: But maybe it can be simpler? Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work: But maybe it can be simpler? Robert Fuller
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Pat Hayes
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo Nathan
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates Norman Gray
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work: But maybe it can be simpler? Nathan
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates Mischa Tuffield
• 200 OK with Content-Location might work: But maybe it can be simpler? Giovanni Tummarello
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) Hugh Glaser
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates Hugh Glaser
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo Iker Huerga
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo Robert Fuller
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo Nathan
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates Mischa Tuffield
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo Antoine Zimmermann
• 200 OK with Content-Location might work Nathan
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo Ian Davis
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates Nathan
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo Robert Fuller
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo Nathan
• Re: Inferring data from network interactions (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) James Leigh
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates Nathan
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo David Wood
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo Mike Kelly
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) Nathan
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates Kingsley Idehen
• Financial Integrity Index proposal begs for linked data applications ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates Nathan
• Re: [Request for Input] Linked Data Specifications Michael Hausenblas
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates Ian Davis
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo Nathan
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo Nathan
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Nathan
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates Nathan
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) Kingsley Idehen
• Re: [Request for Input] Linked Data Specifications David Wood
• Re: wdrs Error (was Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates) Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo Jörn Hees
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates Ian Davis
• Re: WebID and Signed Emails Kingsley Idehen
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) Robert Fuller
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates Kingsley Idehen
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates Mischa Tuffield
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Ian Davis
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates Norman Gray
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) Ian Davis
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo Ian Davis
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo Leigh Dodds
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo Jörn Hees
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates Nathan
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Pat Hayes
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo Mike Kelly
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo David Wood
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? David Wood
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Nathan
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates Ian Davis
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo Mike Kelly
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo Leigh Dodds
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates Norman Gray
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo Giovanni Tummarello
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates Phil Archer
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo Nathan
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo Jörn Hees
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates Nathan
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates Vasiliy Faronov
• Re: Migrating from slash to fragment Nathan
• RE: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates bill.roberts@planet.nl
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Vasiliy Faronov
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo Mike Kelly
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates Leigh Dodds
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) Nathan
• RE: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) bill.roberts@planet.nl
• wdrs Error (was Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates) Phil Archer
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates Phil Archer
• wdrs Error (was Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates) Phil Archer
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates Leigh Dodds
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) Leigh Dodds
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Vasiliy Faronov
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Nathan
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Nathan
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates Nathan
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Dave Reynolds
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo Nathan
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates Dave Reynolds
• Re: [Request for Input] Linked Data Specifications Kingsley Idehen
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) Nathan
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Norman Gray
• RE: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) bill.roberts@planet.nl
• Re: [Request for Input] Linked Data Specifications Nathan
• Re: [Request for Input] Linked Data Specifications Michael Hausenblas
• Re: WebID and Signed Emails Mischa Tuffield
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) Nathan
• Re: [Request for Input] Linked Data Specifications Dave Reynolds
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Nathan
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Ian Davis
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Ian Davis
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Nathan
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) Robert Fuller
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Ian Davis
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Nathan
• [Request for Input] Linked Data Specifications Michael Hausenblas
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Ian Davis
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Ian Davis
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Nathan
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Nathan
• Inferring data from network interactions (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) Leigh Dodds
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Ian Davis
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? William Waites
• What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) Leigh Dodds
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates Phil Archer
• Is 303 really necessary - demo Ian Davis
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Leigh Dodds
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Leigh Dodds
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Leigh Dodds
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Michael Hausenblas
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Leigh Dodds
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates Leigh Dodds
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates Dave Reynolds
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates Egon Willighagen
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? mike amundsen
• isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? David Booth

Thursday, 4 November 2010

• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: WebID and Signed Emails Kingsley Idehen
• Re: WebID and Signed Emails Melvin Carvalho
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? mike amundsen
• WebID and Signed Emails Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? David Booth
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? David Booth
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Mischa Tuffield
• Fwd: Is 303 really necessary? Bradley Allen
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Nathan
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? David Wood
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Hugh Glaser
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? David Wood
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Nathan
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Jörn Hees
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Harry Halpin
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Ian Davis
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Robert Fuller
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Nathan
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Jörn Hees
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Nathan
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Robert Fuller
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Ian Davis
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Ian Davis
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Patrick Durusau
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Nathan
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Nathan
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Patrick Durusau
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? David Wood
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Patrick Durusau
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Ian Davis
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Mike Kelly
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? David Wood
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Ian Davis
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Robin YANG
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Harry Halpin
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Bradley Allen
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Ian Davis
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? bill.roberts@planet.nl
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Ian Davis
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Bradley Allen
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Ian Davis
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Ian Davis
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Leigh Dodds
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Giovanni Tummarello
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? William Waites
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Leigh Dodds
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Ian Davis
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Ian Davis
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Giovanni Tummarello
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Ian Davis
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Web Based RDFa Editor Xi Bai
• Is 303 really necessary? Ian Davis

Wednesday, 3 November 2010

• Re: Breaking News: Google supports GoodRelations Vasiliy Faronov
• Re: Breaking News: Google supports GoodRelations Francisco Javier López Pellicer
• Re: Breaking News: Google supports GoodRelations Vasiliy Faronov
• WOP 2010: Call for Participation valentina presutti
• WOP 2010: Call for Late Breaking News valentina presutti
• ISWC 2010 metadata is online Jie Bao
• COLD2010 workshop program and data Olaf Hartig

Tuesday, 2 November 2010

• Re: Breaking News: Google supports GoodRelations Nathan
• Re: Breaking News: Google supports GoodRelations Juan Sequeda
• Re: Breaking News: Google supports GoodRelations Melvin Carvalho
• Breaking News: Google supports GoodRelations Martin Hepp
• International Journal of Engineering and Industries Robert C. Hsu

Monday, 1 November 2010

• WIMS'11: Call for Papers (Deadline 20th NOV) WIMS'11

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 November 2010 18:19:05 UTC