- From: Phil Archer <phil.archer@talis.com>
- Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 13:54:44 +0000
- To: Vasiliy Faronov <vfaronov@gmail.com>
- CC: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
Thanks very much Vasily. That's very helpful and makes it easy and right to stick with 303 IMO. I was on the TAG and HTTP BIS mailing lists for a long time but had to unsubscribe due to all the discussions, mostly about this and metadata discovery, that kept distracting me ;-) Cheers Phil. On 05/11/2010 13:47, Vasiliy Faronov wrote: > Hi Phil, > > Since you discuss HTTP status codes and their definitions, I just wanted > to point out that the current drafts of HTTPbis (i.e. the upcoming > revision of the HTTP spec) include a definition[1] for 303 specifically > tailored to the way it's used in LD today. > > (There was also a long, philosophical thread[2] on www-tag some time ago > where the merits and shortcomings of this change were heavily debated.) > > [1] > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-12#section-8.3.4 > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Jul/thread.html#msg2 > -- Phil Archer Talis Platform Web: http://www.talis.com Tel: +44 1473 434770 Twitter: philarcher1 LinkedIn: http://uk.linkedin.com/in/philarcher Personal: http://philarcher.org Talis Systems Ltd, Knights Court Solihull Parkway Birmingham Business Park B37 7YB United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0)870 400 5000
Received on Friday, 5 November 2010 13:55:20 UTC