W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > November 2010

Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work: But maybe it can be simpler?

From: Robert Fuller <robert.fuller@deri.org>
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 17:33:29 +0000
Message-ID: <4CD43FE9.4010804@deri.org>
To: nathan@webr3.org
CC: Giovanni Tummarello <giovanni.tummarello@deri.org>, Mike Kelly <mike@mykanjo.co.uk>, Ian Davis <me@iandavis.com>, public-lod <public-lod@w3.org>


On 05/11/10 17:26, Nathan wrote:
> Giovanni Tummarello wrote:
>> How about something that's totally independant from HEADER issues?
>>
>> think normal people here. absolutely 0 interest to mess with headers
>> and http responses.. absolutely no business incentive to do it.
>>
>> as a baseline think someone wanting to annotate with RDFa a hand
>> crafted, apached served html file.
>> really.. as simple as serving this people.
>>
>> as simple as anyone who's using opengraph just copy pastes into their
>> HTML template.. as simple as this
>> really, please, its the only thing that can work?
>
> +1 from me - all this </slash> uri and 303 nonsense, now other codes and
> any form of HTTP awareness is best completely removed. uri#frag gives us
> that semantic indirection we need, without anybody even noticing (and
> allows 200 OK).

What about 404 ;-) ?

What about

http://iandavis.com/2010/303/toucan#FredFlintstone



>
> Best,
>
> Nathan
>

-- 
Robert Fuller
Research Associate
Sindice Team
DERI, Galway
http://sindice.com/
Received on Friday, 5 November 2010 17:34:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:29:51 UTC