W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > November 2010

Re: [open-bibliography] ANN: British National Bibliography

From: Peter Murray-Rust <pm286@cam.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:21:22 +0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTik=wVZxFoV7=Ro6UM68+cE8_V-ZHPravxKTnBzH@mail.gmail.com>
To: List for Working Group on Open Bibliographic Data <open-bibliography@lists.okfn.org>
Cc: William Waites <ww@eris.okfn.org>, public-lod@w3.org, public-xg-lld@w3.org
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Richard Light <richard@light.demon.co.uk>wrote:

> But is it reliable?  I looked up the book I wrote (Presenting XML, SAMS
> Net, 1997) and find that it claims it was written by Laura Alschuler. How
> did that happen?
> Richard - we all expect errors in the Bibliography and it's a brave venture
by the BL to put it out. I expect that it will be a data entry error at some
stage in the past. the important thing is to develop a culture where the
identification of errors is welcomed.

Peter Murray-Rust
Reader in Molecular Informatics
Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry
University of Cambridge
Received on Monday, 22 November 2010 17:21:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:29:51 UTC