- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 11:10:15 -0500
- To: nathan@webr3.org
- CC: Ian Davis <me@iandavis.com>, Pete Johnston <Pete.Johnston@eduserv.org.uk>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4CD97267.9090200@openlinksw.com>
On 11/9/10 10:54 AM, Nathan wrote: > Kingsley Idehen wrote: >> On 11/9/10 6:57 AM, Ian Davis wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Nathan<nathan@webr3.org> wrote: >>>> Pete Johnston wrote: >>>>> "This document mentions the following class" >>>> It's all very simple really, when you remove all the conflated terms. > > it's a description. Yes! We are describing "observations". Can't do this in thin air, must have a projection surface, hence the need for Documents. You see, the whole Web of Data vs. Web of Documents is yet another false dichotomy. The Web is simply evolving its projection media from HTML documents (sorta like blank paper on to which you can scribble) to more Structured Documents (sorta like graph paper, what the spreadsheet kinda models). This new Document type is like graph paper, also like a spreadsheet (supports Name and Address reference values in cells), but with a 3-column restriction and unlimited rows. HTTP lets us stream this powerful 3 column based graph paper document. The underlying conceptual schema (EAV) allows multiple representations (HTML+RDFa, RDF/XML, OData+Atom, OData+JSON, RDF-JSON, GData etc) of the conceptual schema's model semantics. We are using a graph paper like surface to hold the descriptions of our observations. We can use a myriad of syntaxes to achieve this goal as long as said syntaxes are based on a common conceptual schema. Mapping an RDBMS to an RDF syntax isn't some new age magic, it's possible because there is a common conceptual schema at the base re. a DBMS based Relational Property Graphs vs its relative based on Relational Tables. HTTP 200 OK means: Document Found. Content-Type means: Document Content is in a given format. Content-Location means: Document Location. A URI is just an Identifier. We can "Describe" what isn't unambiguously Identified (Named); hence the use of "Names" since the beginning of shared cognition era re. human evolution. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2010 16:10:50 UTC