W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > November 2010

Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200

From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 20:11:40 +0000
Message-ID: <4CDAFC7C.8010607@webr3.org>
To: Lars Heuer <heuer@semagia.com>
CC: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>

Lars Heuer wrote:
> Which solution gives less black spots?

fragments, with approx zero black spots (still to see a valid argument 
against them, vs more than i can list for non fragments)

Received on Wednesday, 10 November 2010 20:12:52 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Bradley Allen: "Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200"
Previous message: Kingsley Idehen: "Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200"
In reply to: Lars Heuer: "Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200"
Next in thread: Bradley Allen: "Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200"
Reply: Bradley Allen: "Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200"
Reply: Lars Heuer: "Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:21:06 UTC