W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > November 2010

Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 13:31:43 -0400
Message-ID: <4CD590FF.60802@openlinksw.com>
To: Bill Roberts <bill@swirrl.com>
CC: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
On 11/6/10 12:41 PM, Bill Roberts wrote:
> On 6 Nov 2010, at 17:25, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> So we have arrived at a destination that's mutually inclusive re. 303 indirection. Basically, an additional technique that uses Content-Location as the switch. Nice, simple, clean, and shouldn't break a thing, as long as people stop producing "old school" RDF resources.
>>
>> In addition, I think we've also triggered a POWDER fix that's been long overlooked.
>>
> +1.
>
> (just to clarify: what do you mean exactly by "old school" RDF resources?)
>
>
>
Defining attributes:

1. missing isDefinedby, isDescribedBy, describedBy assertions
2. do not use resolvable URIs (in Subject or Predicate slots) :-)

-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
President&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Saturday, 6 November 2010 17:32:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:29:51 UTC