W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > November 2010

Re: survey: who uses the triple foaf:name rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:label?

From: Giovanni Tummarello <giovanni.tummarello@deri.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:13:33 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTikthxMcLu+LNNBXUUFuLc3pvv1mGmBx6iHeBWeD@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Cc: foaf-dev Friend of a <foaf-dev@lists.foaf-project.org>, public-lod <public-lod@w3.org>
Yes Sig.ma heavily checks for properties that are subclass of label
and uses them.
I think sparallax as well.
Gio

On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> The FOAF RDFS/OWL document currently includes the triple
>
>  foaf:name rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:label .
>
> This is one of several things that OWL DL oriented tools (eg.
> http://www.mygrid.org.uk/OWL/Validator) don't seem to like, since it
> mixes application schemas with the W3C builtins.
>
> So for now, pure fact-finding. I would like to know if anyone is
> actively using this triple, eg. for Linked Data browsers. If we can
> avoid this degenerating into a thread about the merits or otherwise of
> description logic, I would be hugely grateful.
>
> So -
>
> 1. do you have code / applications that checks to see if a property is
> "rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:label" ?
> 2. do you have any scope to change this behaviour (eg. it's a web
> service under your control, rather than shipping desktop software )
> 3. would you consider checking for ?x rdf:type foaf:LabelProperty or
> other idioms instead (or rather, as well).
> 4. would you object if the triple "foaf:name rdfs:subPropertyOf
> rdfs:label " is removed from future version of the main FOAF RDFS/OWL
> schema? (it could be linked elsewhere, mind)
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Dan
>
>
Received on Friday, 12 November 2010 11:14:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:29:51 UTC