- From: Ian Davis <me@iandavis.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 15:27:38 +0000
- To: Giovanni Tummarello <giovanni.tummarello@deri.org>
- Cc: public-lod <public-lod@w3.org>
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Giovanni Tummarello <giovanni.tummarello@deri.org> wrote: > Hi Ian > > no its not needed see this discussion > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2007Jul/0086.html > pointing to 203 406 or thers.. > > ..but a number of social community mechanisms will activate if you > bring this up, ranging from russian style "you're being antipatriotic > criticizing the existing status quo " to "..but its so deployed now" > and ".. you're distracting the community from other more important > issues ", none of this will make sense if analized by proper logical > means of course (e.g. by a proper IT manager in a proper company, paid > based on actual results). > Yes, but I guess I have to face those to make progress. > But the core of the matter really is : who cares. My educated guess > looking at Sindice flowing data is that everyday out of 100 new sites > on web of data 99.9 simply use RDFa which doesnt have this issue. > I think it's an orthogonal issue to the one RDFa solves. How should I use RDFa to respond to requests to http://iandavis.com/id/me which is a URI that denotes me? > choose how to publish yourself but here is another one. If you chose > NOT to use RDFa you will miss out on anything which will enhance the > user experience based on annotations. As an example see our entry in > the semantic web challange [1]. I'm agnostic on formats, just trying to make things simpler for publishers who want to use hashless URIs in their data. Ian > > Giovanni > > [1] http://www.cs.vu.nl/~pmika/swc/submissions/swc2010_submission_19.pdf > > > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Ian Davis <me@iandavis.com> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> The subject of this email is the title of a blog post I wrote last >> night questioning whether we actually need to continue with the 303 >> redirect approach for Linked Data. My suggestion is that replacing it >> with a 200 is in practice harmless and that nothing actually breaks on >> the web. Please take a moment to read it if you are interested. >> >> http://iand.posterous.com/is-303-really-necessary >> >> Cheers, >> >> Ian >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 4 November 2010 15:28:11 UTC