Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?)

Pete Johnston wrote:
> "This document mentions the following class"

It's all very simple really, when you remove all the conflated terms.

What is this:

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
   xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
   xmlns:wdrs="http://www.w3.org/2007/05/powder-s#"
   xmlns:dbp="http://dbpedia.org/resource/"
   >

   <dbp:Toucan rdf:about="http://iandavis.com/2010/303/toucan">
     <rdfs:label>A Toucan</rdfs:label>
     <foaf:depiction 
rdf:resource="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6d/Pteroglossus-torquatus-001.jpg/250px-Pteroglossus-torquatus-001.jpg" 
/>
     <rdfs:comment>This resource is an individual toucan that happens to 
live in southern mexico.</rdfs:comment>
     <wdrs:describedby 
rdf:resource="http://iandavis.com/2010/303/toucan.rdf"/>
   </dbp:Toucan>

   <foaf:Document rdf:about="http://iandavis.com/2010/303/toucan.rdf">
     <rdfs:label>A Description of a Toucan</rdfs:label>
     <rdfs:comment>This document is a description of the toucan 
resource.</rdfs:comment>
   </foaf:Document>

</rdf:RDF>

<http://iandavis.com/2010/303/toucan> is simply another name for 
whatever the above is.

Hints:
  - it's not a resource
  - it's not a document
  - it's not an rdf document
  - it's not a toucan

Best,

Nathan

Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2010 11:24:50 UTC