Re: Is 303 really necessary?

Ian Davis wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote:
>> I'll roll with the "who cares" line of thinking, I certainly don't care how
>> you or dbpedia or foaf or dc publish your data, so long as I can deref it,
>> but for god sake don't go telling everybody using slash URIs and 200 is "The
>> Right Thing TM"
> 
> Sure. We don't want to restrict choice or options. I am focussed here
> only on simplifying a common pattern.

Using 200 will be much nicer on the network, servers and clients, which 
is a major factor, and much easier to deploy (even makes it deployable 
on cheap hosts).

I don't condone any of this of course, who cares if I do, but 1 problem 
is better than 3.

Received on Friday, 5 November 2010 11:16:26 UTC