W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > November 2010

Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates

From: Egon Willighagen <egon.willighagen@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 08:34:07 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTinhLiexQ51JvUB4z6rqEB6wsj1bXO8TWPb43xdj@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Cc: "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
Hi Kingsley,

On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 1:58 AM, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote:
> As a best practice, common use of these predicates would increase
> navigability, link density, and overall cohesiveness of the burgeoning Web
> of Linked Data. It would truly demonstrate practicing what we preach,
> dog-food style!

So you have some examples where these two specifications are used?


Dr E.L. Willighagen
Postdoctoral Research Associate
University of Cambridge
Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/
LinkedIn: http://se.linkedin.com/in/egonw
Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/
PubList: http://www.citeulike.org/user/egonw/tag/papers
Received on Friday, 5 November 2010 07:35:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:29:51 UTC