- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 12:00:10 +0000
- To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- CC: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
Dave Reynolds wrote: > Hi Michael, > > A good idea. My sentiments exactly :) Michael, also worth mentioning RDFa, Turtle, N3? and also any note on IRI or HTTP-bis? can you bold the link to the SWAP publications / highlight in some way, as it's a pretty important one. Perhaps more vocabs, perhaps sioc, org, dct, foaf and a pointer to a good resource for vocabs. > Could I request you more clearly separate the formal specifications from > the de facto community practice documents. The Change Set vocabulary, to > pick one example, doesn't really have the same standing, adoption or > level of scrutiny as the RFCs, does it? and +1 to the above (re make them clearly distinct, not say CS is of the same standing as web standards!). Best, Nathan
Received on Friday, 5 November 2010 12:01:23 UTC