- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 13:53:54 +0000
- To: Mike Kelly <mike@mykanjo.co.uk>
- CC: Ian Davis <me@iandavis.com>, public-lod@w3.org
Mike Kelly wrote: > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote: >> Ian Davis wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> To aid discussion I create a small demo of the idea put forth in my >>> blog post http://iand.posterous.com/is-303-really-necessary >>> >>> Here is the URI of a toucan: >>> >>> http://iandavis.com/2010/303/toucan >> Ian, where's the demo of /toucan#frag so everybody can see that you can use >> 200 OK *and* keep the graph clean? will you give it fair air time in the >> (non-)debate? will you show us a comparison of the two and benefits of each? >> >>> does this break the web and if so, how? >> Of course it doesn't break the web, anybody who says that being HTTP >> friendly breaks the web is clearly wrong. >> >> Wrong question, correct question is "if I 200 OK will people think this is a >> document", to which the answer is yes. You're toucan is a :Document. >> > > That assertion would be wrong if the response contained a > Content-Location header pointing to the specific document resource. http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/154
Received on Friday, 5 November 2010 13:55:10 UTC