- From: Bradley Allen <bradley.p.allen@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 09:25:50 -0700
- To: Ian Davis <me@iandavis.com>
- Cc: Giovanni Tummarello <giovanni.tummarello@deri.org>, public-lod <public-lod@w3.org>
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Ian Davis <me@iandavis.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Bradley Allen <bradley.p.allen@gmail.com> wrote: >> Basically what you are saying is: if I have a single URI that responds >> to an HTTP GET with (X)HTML+RDFa by default, and supports other RDF >> serializations through content negotiation, then all of that can be >> done without recourse to a 303 redirect and should be perfectly >> compatible with linked data best practice. > > That is what I would like to see and what I believe is possible. It's > not current practice, so I'm seeking a change. > I am in violent agreement. It is long past due that someone made this point. As has been said been said earlier, this simplifies implementation, eliminates unnecessary traffic and is completely transparent to linked data clients that do content negotiation. - BPA >> Bradley P. Allen >> http://bradleypallen.org
Received on Thursday, 4 November 2010 16:26:23 UTC