Re: Is 303 really necessary?

Hi,

On 4 November 2010 17:51, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote:
> But, for whatever reasons, we've made our choices, each has pro's and
> cons, and we have to live with them - different things have different
> name, and the giant global graph is usable. Please, keep it that way.

I think it's useful to continually assess the state of the art to see
whether we're on track. My experience, which seems to be confirmed by
comments from other people on this thread, is that we're seeing push
back from the wider web community -- who have already published way
more data that we have -- on the technical approach we've been
advocating, so looking for a middle ground seems useful.

Different things do have different names, but conflating IR/NIR is not
part of Ian's proposal which addresses the publishing mechanism only.

Cheers,

L.

-- 
Leigh Dodds
Programme Manager, Talis Platform
Talis
leigh.dodds@talis.com
http://www.talis.com

Received on Friday, 5 November 2010 09:42:39 UTC