- From: Jörn Hees <j_hees@cs.uni-kl.de>
- Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 16:21:22 +0100
- To: public-lod@w3.org
Thanks for the clarification. As I guess there are quite a lot of people who -- like me -- didn't notice this part of your suggestion I'll summarize it like this: You still want to include a Content-Location field in the header denoting that you're actually retrieving a document more precisely an entity from a different URI: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec7.html#sec7 So instead of going for 303 with Location field redirection you simply want to provide something with a 200 but tell the enduser "hey, but actually you see something from ... here" with the Content-Location field. For the toucan example see this "parallel mail": http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2010Nov/0153.html Jörn PS: I'm out.
Received on Friday, 5 November 2010 15:22:02 UTC