Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo

Thanks for the clarification.

As I guess there are quite a lot of people who -- like me -- didn't notice 
this part of your suggestion I'll summarize it like this:

You still want to include a Content-Location field in the header denoting that 
you're actually retrieving a document more precisely an entity from a different 
URI:
http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec7.html#sec7

So instead of going for 303 with Location field redirection you simply want to 
provide something with a 200 but tell the enduser "hey, but actually you see 
something from ... here" with the Content-Location field.

For the toucan example see this "parallel mail":
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2010Nov/0153.html

Jörn

PS: I'm out.