- From: joel sachs <jsachs@csee.umbc.edu>
- Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 17:04:44 -0500 (EST)
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- cc: nathan@webr3.org, Ian Davis <me@iandavis.com>, Pete Johnston <Pete.Johnston@eduserv.org.uk>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > On 11/9/10 11:10 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: >> > > A URI is just an Identifier. We can't "Describe" what isn't unambiguously > Identified (Named); Kingsley, I think we can, though we might not be properly understood, e.g. "Kingsley was great in Gandhi and Sexy Beast." Wasn't this part of the summer's argument regarding literals as rdf:subjects , i.e. Those opposed: But you might be misunderstood. Those in favour: We'll take our chances. ? Joel. > hence the use of "Names" since the beginning of shared > cognition era re. human evolution. > > -- > > Regards, > > Kingsley Idehen President& CEO > OpenLink Software > Web: http://www.openlinksw.com > Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen > Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen > > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2010 22:05:26 UTC