- From: Gong Cheng <gcheng@seu.edu.cn>
- Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 22:55:29 +0800
- To: "'Dan Brickley'" <danbri@danbri.org>, "'public-lod'" <public-lod@w3.org>
Falcons is using <?p, rdfs:subPropertyOf, rdfs:label> to discover label-like properties. But it is OK to remove <foaf:name, rdfs:subPropertyOf, rdfs:label> because we have hard-coded foaf:name as a label-like property. Cheers, Gong > -----Original Message----- > From: public-lod-request@w3.org [mailto:public-lod-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Dan > Brickley > Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 7:09 PM > To: foaf-dev Friend of a; public-lod > Subject: survey: who uses the triple foaf:name rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:label? > > Dear all, > > The FOAF RDFS/OWL document currently includes the triple > > foaf:name rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:label . > > This is one of several things that OWL DL oriented tools (eg. > http://www.mygrid.org.uk/OWL/Validator) don't seem to like, since it > mixes application schemas with the W3C builtins. > > So for now, pure fact-finding. I would like to know if anyone is > actively using this triple, eg. for Linked Data browsers. If we can > avoid this degenerating into a thread about the merits or otherwise of > description logic, I would be hugely grateful. > > So - > > 1. do you have code / applications that checks to see if a property is > "rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:label" ? > 2. do you have any scope to change this behaviour (eg. it's a web > service under your control, rather than shipping desktop software ) > 3. would you consider checking for ?x rdf:type foaf:LabelProperty or > other idioms instead (or rather, as well). > 4. would you object if the triple "foaf:name rdfs:subPropertyOf > rdfs:label " is removed from future version of the main FOAF RDFS/OWL > schema? (it could be linked elsewhere, mind) > > Thanks in advance, > > Dan
Received on Friday, 12 November 2010 14:56:08 UTC