W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > November 2010

Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work: But maybe it can be simpler?

From: Mike Kelly <mike@mykanjo.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 18:06:07 +0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTimUGLySertJqVGBhtwyzAGyCnWAxSDYYM8+zr4j@mail.gmail.com>
To: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@insa-lyon.fr>
Cc: Giovanni Tummarello <giovanni.tummarello@deri.org>, public-lod <public-lod@w3.org>
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Antoine Zimmermann
<antoine.zimmermann@insa-lyon.fr> wrote:
> Le 05/11/2010 18:25, Giovanni Tummarello a écrit :
>> How about something that's totally independant from HEADER issues?
>> think normal people here. absolutely 0 interest to mess with headers
>> and http responses.. absolutely no business incentive to do it.
> Solutions to technical problems are not for little kids, grandmothers and
> casual Web users. Getting a Web page on the Web is actually really complex,
> you have to do a lot of stuff with the header, maybe content-negociate etc.
> Yet, little kids and grandmothers can jump from webpages to webpages.

Apparently Ian achieved his example on Apache by simply dropping in
toucan.rdf and letting apache handle the rest with +MultiViews

mike@foobar:~$ curl -v http://iandavis.com/2010/303/toucan
> GET /2010/303/toucan HTTP/1.1
< HTTP/1.1 200 OK
< Server: Apache/2.2.8 (Ubuntu)
< Content-Location: toucan.rdf

Received on Friday, 5 November 2010 18:06:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:29:51 UTC