- From: Giovanni Tummarello <giovanni.tummarello@deri.org>
- Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:57:16 +0100
- To: Ian Davis <me@iandavis.com>
- Cc: public-lod <public-lod@w3.org>
I might be wrong but I dont like it much . Sindice would index it as 2 documents. http://iandavis.com/2010/303/toucan http://iandavis.com/2010/303/toucan.rdf i *really* would NOT want to different URLs resolving to the same thing thanks Giovanni On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Ian Davis <me@iandavis.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > To aid discussion I create a small demo of the idea put forth in my > blog post http://iand.posterous.com/is-303-really-necessary > > Here is the URI of a toucan: > > http://iandavis.com/2010/303/toucan > > Here is the URI of a description of that toucan: > > http://iandavis.com/2010/303/toucan.rdf > > As you can see both these resources have distinct URIs. > > I created a new property http://vocab.org/desc/schema/description to > link the toucan to its description. The schema for that property is > here: > > http://vocab.org/desc/schema > > (BTW I looked at the powder describedBy property and it's clearly > designed to point to one particular type of description, not a general > RDF one. I also looked at > http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/web/irw.owl and didn't see > anything suitable) > > Here is the URI Burner view of the toucan resource and of its > description document: > > http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/about/html/http://iandavis.com/2010/303/toucan > > http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/about/html/http/iandavis.com/2010/303/toucan.rdf > > I'd like to use this demo to focus on the main thrust of my question: > does this break the web and if so, how? > > Cheers, > > Ian > > P.S. I am not fully caught up on the other thread, so maybe someone > has already produced this demo > >
Received on Friday, 5 November 2010 13:57:53 UTC