W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > November 2010

Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo

From: Giovanni Tummarello <giovanni.tummarello@deri.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:57:16 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTikXa0Aknq+a1WtrpN0OaZsG_M3gKYh70QznJPNh@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ian Davis <me@iandavis.com>
Cc: public-lod <public-lod@w3.org>
I might be wrong but I dont like it much . Sindice would index it as 2
documents.

http://iandavis.com/2010/303/toucan
http://iandavis.com/2010/303/toucan.rdf

i *really* would NOT want to different URLs resolving to the same thing

thanks
Giovanni


On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Ian Davis <me@iandavis.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> To aid discussion I create a small demo of the idea put forth in my
> blog post http://iand.posterous.com/is-303-really-necessary
>
> Here is the URI of a toucan:
>
> http://iandavis.com/2010/303/toucan
>
> Here is the URI of a description of that toucan:
>
> http://iandavis.com/2010/303/toucan.rdf
>
> As you can see both these resources have distinct URIs.
>
> I created a new property http://vocab.org/desc/schema/description to
> link the toucan to its description. The schema for that property is
> here:
>
> http://vocab.org/desc/schema
>
> (BTW I looked at the powder describedBy property and it's clearly
> designed to point to one particular type of description, not a general
> RDF one. I also looked at
> http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/web/irw.owl and didn't see
> anything suitable)
>
> Here is the URI Burner view of the toucan resource and of its
> description document:
>
> http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/about/html/http://iandavis.com/2010/303/toucan
>
> http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/about/html/http/iandavis.com/2010/303/toucan.rdf
>
> I'd like to use this demo to focus on the main thrust of my question:
> does this break the web  and if so, how?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ian
>
> P.S. I am not fully caught up on the other thread, so maybe someone
> has already produced this demo
>
>
Received on Friday, 5 November 2010 13:57:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:21:06 UTC