W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > November 2010

Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo

From: Robert Fuller <robert.fuller@deri.org>
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 17:07:28 +0000
Message-ID: <4CD439D0.2050703@deri.org>
To: Ian Davis <me@iandavis.com>
CC: public-lod@w3.org
On 05/11/10 16:50, Ian Davis wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Robert Fuller<robert.fuller@deri.org>  wrote:
>> I submitted both urls to sindice earlier. Both were indexed and have the
>> same content. In the search results[1] one displays with title "A Toucan",
>> the other with title, "A Description of a Toucan".
>>
>> http://sindice.com/search?q=toucan+domain%3Aiandavis.com&qt=term
>>
>
> So SIndice see them as distinct resources and doesn't concern itself
> with the lack of a 303 redirect?

Both pages returned http status code of 200 and some content. Sindice 
extracted metadata from the content (using any23), and associated that 
content with the requested url's.

Sindice doesn't "expect" 303's, but it follows them.

This isn't always a good thing...
http://inspector.sindice.com/inspect?url=http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/IanDavis


>
> Ian

-- 
Robert Fuller
Research Associate
Sindice Team
DERI, Galway
http://sindice.com/
Received on Friday, 5 November 2010 17:08:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:29:51 UTC