W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > November 2010

Re: Is 303 really necessary?

From: Ian Davis <me@iandavis.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 16:13:36 +0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=VNUPz7hbnr7KCe-sBJ2jDkt76NGjPrD3WvFyu@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bradley Allen <bradley.p.allen@gmail.com>
Cc: Giovanni Tummarello <giovanni.tummarello@deri.org>, public-lod <public-lod@w3.org>
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Bradley Allen <bradley.p.allen@gmail.com> wrote:
> Basically what you are saying is: if I have a single URI that responds
> to an HTTP GET with (X)HTML+RDFa by default, and supports other RDF
> serializations through content negotiation, then all of that can be
> done without recourse to a 303 redirect and should be perfectly
> compatible with linked data best practice.

That is what I would like to see and what I believe is possible. It's
not current practice, so I'm seeking a change.

> Is that correct?


> Bradley P. Allen
> http://bradleypallen.org

Received on Thursday, 4 November 2010 16:14:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:29:51 UTC