W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > November 2010

Re: Is 303 really necessary?

From: Mike Kelly <mike@mykanjo.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 17:12:52 +0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTik-Va+=7++eLs95y6wp9YtCnQU6i5+nadRmVZaj@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ian Davis <me@iandavis.com>
Cc: Robin YANG <yang.square@gmail.com>, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>, public-lod@w3.org, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Ian Davis <me@iandavis.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Robin YANG <yang.square@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Ok, yes, we can use ontology or ex:isDescribedBy, but none of solution
>> explained what happens when you dereferencing the URI over HTTP which you
>> just used to refer to the non-information resources.
>> Don't u need 303 or hash URI again to differentiate when
>> dereferencing whatever subject URI we minted before ex:isDescribedBy.
>>
>
> When you dereference the URI you get back a representation with some
> data about the thing the URI denotes. I don't think you need any other
> URI unless you also want to assign a URI to the representation itself.
>

+1

In the case where you want, or already have, a URI assigned to the
representation; an appropriate Content-Location header in the response
is the best way forward.

Cheers,
Mike
Received on Thursday, 4 November 2010 17:13:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:29:51 UTC