W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > November 2010

Re: Is 303 really necessary?

From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 18:39:05 +0000
Message-ID: <4CD2FDC9.2030306@webr3.org>
To: Ian Davis <me@iandavis.com>
CC: "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
Ian Davis wrote:
> On Thursday, November 4, 2010, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote:
>> If 303s are killing you then use fragment URIs, if you refuse to use fragments for whatever reason then use something new like tdb:'s, support the data you've published in one pattern, or archive it and remove it from the web.
> These are publishing alternatives, but I'm focussed on the 303 issue here.

Why? 303 is a sub issue not the real issue - Why not compare which style 
(slash, frag, tdb) is the least ambiguous, easiest to deploy and 
consume, kindest to the network and to servers, and /then/ work at 
fixing the issues with that one.


Received on Thursday, 4 November 2010 18:40:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:29:51 UTC