W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > November 2010

Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo

From: Robert Fuller <robert.fuller@deri.org>
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 16:42:07 +0000
Message-ID: <4CD433DF.5020201@deri.org>
To: Ian Davis <me@iandavis.com>
CC: public-lod@w3.org
Hi,

I submitted both urls to sindice earlier. Both were indexed and have the 
same content. In the search results[1] one displays with title "A 
Toucan", the other with title, "A Description of a Toucan".

http://sindice.com/search?q=toucan+domain%3Aiandavis.com&qt=term

Robert.

On 05/11/10 09:43, Ian Davis wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> To aid discussion I create a small demo of the idea put forth in my
> blog post http://iand.posterous.com/is-303-really-necessary
>
> Here is the URI of a toucan:
>
> http://iandavis.com/2010/303/toucan
>
> Here is the URI of a description of that toucan:
>
> http://iandavis.com/2010/303/toucan.rdf
>
> As you can see both these resources have distinct URIs.
>
> I created a new property http://vocab.org/desc/schema/description to
> link the toucan to its description. The schema for that property is
> here:
>
> http://vocab.org/desc/schema
>
> (BTW I looked at the powder describedBy property and it's clearly
> designed to point to one particular type of description, not a general
> RDF one. I also looked at
> http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/web/irw.owl and didn't see
> anything suitable)
>
> Here is the URI Burner view of the toucan resource and of its
> description document:
>
> http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/about/html/http://iandavis.com/2010/303/toucan
>
> http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/about/html/http/iandavis.com/2010/303/toucan.rdf
>
> I'd like to use this demo to focus on the main thrust of my question:
> does this break the web  and if so, how?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ian
>
> P.S. I am not fully caught up on the other thread, so maybe someone
> has already produced this demo
>

-- 
Robert Fuller
Research Associate
Sindice Team
DERI, Galway
http://sindice.com/
Received on Friday, 5 November 2010 16:42:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:29:51 UTC