- From: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2010 14:50:58 -0700
- To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Cc: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>, public-lod@w3.org, semantic-web@w3.org
Received on Sunday, 7 November 2010 21:51:27 UTC
Is there some reason not to use LODE? http://linkedevents.org/ontology/ -- Rob Sanderson On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk> wrote: > On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 13:26:15 +0100 > "Michael Schneider" <schneid@fzi.de> wrote: > > > For your information, the term "EON" is also used as the acronym of > > the "International Workshop on Evaluation of Ontology-based Tools", > > an (almost-) yearly event that exists since 2002. See [1] for the > > proceedings of the first EON workshop. It would probably not be > > advisable to reuse the acronym for something else in the Semantic Web > > context. > > I'm aware of it, but thought that confusion between them would likely > be minimal. What do other people think? > > If others think confusion is likely, I have a backup name: the Event > Representation Argot. :-) > > -- > Toby A Inkster > <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> > <http://tobyinkster.co.uk> > > >
Received on Sunday, 7 November 2010 21:51:27 UTC