- From: William Waites <ww@styx.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 22:47:26 +0100
- To: Bob Ferris <zazi@elbklang.net>
- Cc: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
* [2010-11-26 15:15:42 +0100] Bob Ferris <zazi@elbklang.net> écrit: ] ] I wrote a note as an attempt to clarify a bit the terms Resource, ] Information Resource and Document and their relations (from my point of ] view). Maybe this helps to figure out the bits of the current confusion. So taking a cue from this thread, I've implemented something that I think is in line with the original suggestion for a new dataset that I'm working on. If you request, e.g. http://bnb.bibliographica.org/entry/GB8102507 with an Accept header indicating an interest in RDF data, you will get a 200 response with a Content-Location header indicating that what is returned is actually the GB8102507.rdf document. It seems to me that this is enough information that a client needn't be confused between the document and the book, "A good man in Africa". There is foaf:primaryTopic linkage in the document that should also adequately explain the state of affairs. However it seems that some clients are confused -- tabulator for instance as was pointed out in irc the other day. My question is, should I change the behaviour to the standard 303 redirect or leave it as a stake in the ground saying that this is a reasonable arrangement? Cheers, -w -- William Waites http://eris.okfn.org/ww/foaf#i 9C7E F636 52F6 1004 E40A E565 98E3 BBF3 8320 7664
Received on Friday, 26 November 2010 21:47:57 UTC