Re: subjects as literals

joel sachs wrote:
> Wasn't this part of the summer's argument regarding literals as 
> rdf:subjects , i.e.

.. and that ones easy,

If { a rel b } infers { b is rel of a }, and b can be a literal in the 
first statement, then b must also be a literal in the second statement.

Whether or not a specific dl or serialization supports the full set of 
statements that can be made, or a subset of those, is a different issue 
all together, a serialization of a dl, cannot determine the real world, 
it cannot assert that { "Joel" is the name of :joel } cannot be said, it 
can only confess that it doesn't provide a way to say that.

Best,

Nathan