joel sachs wrote: > Wasn't this part of the summer's argument regarding literals as > rdf:subjects , i.e. .. and that ones easy, If { a rel b } infers { b is rel of a }, and b can be a literal in the first statement, then b must also be a literal in the second statement. Whether or not a specific dl or serialization supports the full set of statements that can be made, or a subset of those, is a different issue all together, a serialization of a dl, cannot determine the real world, it cannot assert that { "Joel" is the name of :joel } cannot be said, it can only confess that it doesn't provide a way to say that. Best, NathanReceived on Tuesday, 9 November 2010 22:45:28 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:29:51 UTC