- From: Bradley Allen <bradley.p.allen@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:25:40 -0800
- To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Cc: nathan@webr3.org, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
Toby- A quick correction: in the previous email, by "end of the IR" I meant to say "end of the IR's URI." I note also that the LC's Thesaurus of Graphic Materials uses slash URIs instead of hash URIs. e.g. http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/graphicMaterials/tgm003862 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/graphicMaterials/tgm000013 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/graphicMaterials/tgm002276 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/graphicMaterials/tgm004048 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/graphicMaterials/tgm005114 I'm curious as to why the LC would use two different schemes in this regard. Bradley P. Allen http://bradleypallen.org On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Bradley Allen <bradley.p.allen@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks; that's a useful example. So the convention in that case is to > append '#concept' to the end of the IR? > > Bradley P. Allen > http://bradleypallen.org > > > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk> wrote: >> On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 12:30:35 -0800 >> Bradley Allen <bradley.p.allen@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Nathan- I think you are overly discounting scalability problems with >>> fragment URIs. >>> >>> Most of the use cases I am dealing with in moving linked data into >>> production at Elsevier entail SKOS concept schemes with concepts >>> numbering in the 100,000's to millions, which will be constantly under >>> curation, preferably using REST APIs that allow POSTs and PUTs to >>> create and update individual concepts. >> >> The Library of Congress Subject Headings consist of over a quarter of a >> million SKOS concepts. They use hash URIs. >> >> e.g. >> http://id.loc.gov/authorities/sh85121735#concept >> http://id.loc.gov/authorities/sh85121591#concept >> http://id.loc.gov/authorities/sh85119315#concept >> http://id.loc.gov/authorities/sh86001831#concept >> http://id.loc.gov/authorities/sh85072413#concept >> >> -- >> Toby A Inkster >> <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> >> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 10 November 2010 23:26:14 UTC