W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > November 2010

Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200

From: Bradley Allen <bradley.p.allen@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 12:30:35 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTikRjB4ATkhxQMEGQ_eaesd31rhexjPr2FurGBwF@mail.gmail.com>
To: nathan@webr3.org
Cc: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
Nathan- I think you are overly discounting scalability problems with
fragment URIs.

Most of the use cases I am dealing with in moving linked data into
production at Elsevier entail SKOS concept schemes with concepts
numbering in the 100,000's to millions, which will be constantly under
curation, preferably using REST APIs that allow POSTs and PUTs to
create and update individual concepts.

Can you articulate a reasonable way in which that can be accomplished
using fragment URIs? - regards, BPA

Bradley P. Allen

On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote:
> Lars Heuer wrote:
>> Which solution gives less black spots?
> fragments, with approx zero black spots (still to see a valid argument
> against them, vs more than i can list for non fragments)
Received on Wednesday, 10 November 2010 20:31:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:29:51 UTC