W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > November 2010

Re: Is 303 really necessary?

From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 16:03:39 +0000
To: Ian Davis <me@iandavis.com>
Cc: nathan@webr3.org, Leigh Dodds <leigh.dodds@talis.com>, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>, public-lod@w3.org, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20101108160339.71d1ea0d@miranda.g5n.co.uk>
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 10:24:43 +0000
Ian Davis <me@iandavis.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote:
>
>> Not at all, I'm saying that if big-corp makes a /web crawler/ that
>> describes what documents are about and publishes RDF triples
>>  
>>  </toucan> :primaryTopic dbpedia:Toucan ; a :Document .  
>
> i don't think so. If the bigcorp is producing triples from their crawl
> then why wouldn't they use the triples they are sent (and/or
> content-location, link headers etc).

Perhaps they try to use them, but don't understand the serialisation
you're providing.

Or perhaps they can parse your triples, but don't realise that
{</toucan> a ex:Toucan.} implies Not({</toucan> a foaf:Document.}).

-- 
Toby A Inkster
<mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
<http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Monday, 8 November 2010 16:04:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:21:06 UTC