W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > November 2010

Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work

From: Bill Roberts <bill@swirrl.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 17:41:50 +0100
Cc: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
Message-Id: <D33CCEA6-9963-4BB9-A56D-78D5D1D79AEE@swirrl.com>
To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>

On 6 Nov 2010, at 17:25, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>> 
> All,
> 
> So we have arrived at a destination that's mutually inclusive re. 303 indirection. Basically, an additional technique that uses Content-Location as the switch. Nice, simple, clean, and shouldn't break a thing, as long as people stop producing "old school" RDF resources.
> 
> In addition, I think we've also triggered a POWDER fix that's been long overlooked.
>  

+1.

(just to clarify: what do you mean exactly by "old school" RDF resources?)
Received on Saturday, 6 November 2010 16:42:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:29:51 UTC