- From: Robert Fuller <robert.fuller@deri.org>
- Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 10:41:09 +0000
- To: Leigh Dodds <leigh.dodds@talis.com>
- CC: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>, Ian Davis <me@iandavis.com>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
> So here's a couple of questions for those of you on the list who have > implemented Linked Data tools, applications, services, etc: > > * Do you rely on or require HTTP 303 redirects in your application? Or > does your app just follow the redirect? For sindice - no we do not rely on or require them, merely follow. > * Would your application tool/service/etc break or generic inaccurate > data if Ian's pattern was used to publish Linked Data. It wouldn't break sindice. However... with regard to publishing ontologies, we could expect additional overhead if same content is delivered on retrieving different Resources for example http://example.com/schema/latitude and http://example.com/schema/longitude . In such a case ETag could be used to suggest the contents are identical, but not sure that is a practical solution. I expect that without 303 it will be more difficult in particular to publish and process ontologies. Rob. -- Robert Fuller Research Associate Sindice Team DERI, Galway http://sindice.com/
Received on Friday, 5 November 2010 10:41:42 UTC