W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > November 2010

Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200

From: Bradley Allen <bradley.p.allen@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:35:03 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTimywebN6d0z5qj7W00_b-qsAkR6HSTOssNUpyzr@mail.gmail.com>
To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Cc: nathan@webr3.org, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
Got it. Thanks very much to you and Nathan for walking me through
this. - cheers, BPA

Bradley P. Allen
http://bradleypallen.org



On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:13:42 -0800
> Bradley Allen <bradley.p.allen@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks; that's a useful example. So the convention in that case is to
>> append '#concept' to the end of the IR?
>
> #concept is what LOC is using for their SKOS Concepts. #me or similar
> might be more conventional for FOAF Persons. The BBC uses #artist for
> the BBC Music site, e.g.
>
>  http://www.bbc.co.uk/music/artists/cc197bad-dc9c-440d-a5b5-d52ba2e14234#artist
>
> And the BBC Programmes guide uses #programme:
>
>  http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006mvhd#programme
>
> #this is a good general fragment ID if you can't think of a better
> convention for your data. I think it's what Virtuoso uses for a lot of
> its URIs.
>
> --
> Toby A Inkster
> <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 10 November 2010 23:35:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:29:51 UTC