W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > November 2010

Re: Is 303 really necessary?

From: Ian Davis <me@iandavis.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 16:55:03 +0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTim8DAeyn22eP83gU89fXHapKebhft=Z8MPp0c2i@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robin YANG <yang.square@gmail.com>
Cc: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>, public-lod@w3.org, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Robin YANG <yang.square@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, yes, we can use ontology or ex:isDescribedBy, but none of solution
> explained what happens when you dereferencing the URI over HTTP which you
> just used to refer to the non-information resources.
> Don't u need 303 or hash URI again to differentiate when
> dereferencing whatever subject URI we minted before ex:isDescribedBy.
>

When you dereference the URI you get back a representation with some
data about the thing the URI denotes. I don't think you need any other
URI unless you also want to assign a URI to the representation itself.

Ian
Received on Thursday, 4 November 2010 16:55:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:29:51 UTC