Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates

On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 09:05:09 +0000
Phil Archer <phil.archer@talis.com> wrote:

> I wrote a short blog entry-like piece last night [1]. My basic point 
> being that I agree wholly with Ian's analysis but disagree with his 
> conclusions and I argue the case for a new HTTP status code.

I also had that thought. Instead of:

	200 OK

We'd have:

	250 This Might Do

I created a test script to play around with this idea a few days ago,
then promptly forgot all about it.

http://examples.tobyinkster.co.uk/test-status-codes.cgi/250/This%20Might%20Do

-- 
Toby A Inkster
<mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
<http://tobyinkster.co.uk>

Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2010 01:26:06 UTC