W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > November 2010

Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo

From: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 10:21:25 -0400
Cc: Ian Davis <me@iandavis.com>, public-lod@w3.org
Message-Id: <6D8B883F-26E9-401F-97D4-D90C9018B361@3roundstones.com>
To: nathan@webr3.org

On Nov 5, 2010, at 08:37, Nathan wrote:

> Ian Davis wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> To aid discussion I create a small demo of the idea put forth in my
>> blog post http://iand.posterous.com/is-303-really-necessary
>> Here is the URI of a toucan:
>> http://iandavis.com/2010/303/toucan
> Ian, where's the demo of /toucan#frag so everybody can see that you can use 200 OK *and* keep the graph clean? will you give it fair air time in the (non-)debate? will you show us a comparison of the two and benefits of each?
>> does this break the web  and if so, how?
> Of course it doesn't break the web, anybody who says that being HTTP friendly breaks the web is clearly wrong.
> Wrong question, correct question is "if I 200 OK will people think this is a document", to which the answer is yes. You're toucan is a :Document.

Agreed.  That's my problem with this approach.

Received on Friday, 5 November 2010 14:22:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:29:51 UTC