- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 17:22:47 -0500
- To: joel sachs <jsachs@csee.umbc.edu>
- CC: nathan@webr3.org, Ian Davis <me@iandavis.com>, Pete Johnston <Pete.Johnston@eduserv.org.uk>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
On 11/9/10 5:04 PM, joel sachs wrote: > On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > >> On 11/9/10 11:10 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: >>> > >> >> A URI is just an Identifier. We can't "Describe" what isn't >> unambiguously Identified (Named); > > Kingsley, > > I think we can, though we might not be properly understood, e.g. > "Kingsley was great in Gandhi and Sexy Beast." To whom is this unambiguous? Kingsley > > Wasn't this part of the summer's argument regarding literals as > rdf:subjects , i.e. > > Those opposed: But you might be misunderstood. > Those in favour: We'll take our chances. > ? > > Joel. > > > > > > > >> hence the use of "Names" since the beginning of shared cognition era >> re. human evolution. > > > > > > >> >> -- >> >> Regards, >> >> Kingsley Idehen President& CEO >> OpenLink Software >> Web: http://www.openlinksw.com >> Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen >> Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen >> >> >> >> >> >> > > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2010 22:23:25 UTC