- From: Mike Kelly <mike@mykanjo.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 13:33:08 +0000
- To: nathan@webr3.org
- Cc: Ian Davis <me@iandavis.com>, public-lod@w3.org
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote: > Ian Davis wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> To aid discussion I create a small demo of the idea put forth in my >> blog post http://iand.posterous.com/is-303-really-necessary >> >> Here is the URI of a toucan: >> >> http://iandavis.com/2010/303/toucan > > Ian, where's the demo of /toucan#frag so everybody can see that you can use > 200 OK *and* keep the graph clean? will you give it fair air time in the > (non-)debate? will you show us a comparison of the two and benefits of each? > >> does this break the web and if so, how? > > Of course it doesn't break the web, anybody who says that being HTTP > friendly breaks the web is clearly wrong. > > Wrong question, correct question is "if I 200 OK will people think this is a > document", to which the answer is yes. You're toucan is a :Document. > That assertion would be wrong if the response contained a Content-Location header pointing to the specific document resource. Cheers, Mike
Received on Friday, 5 November 2010 13:33:43 UTC