Re: Is 303 really necessary?

On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 22:29 -0400, mike amundsen wrote:
>         <snip>
>         However, the key point is that it is *layered* on the good
>         old http scheme.  Thus, if you click on this URI:
>         
>          http://t-d-b.org/?http://dbooth.org/2005/dbooth/
>         
>         it works, with no changes needed to your browser
>         </snip>
> So the thinking here is to use the "concept" of a scheme without
> actually minting one because the most common client today would throw
> an error if an actual scheme was used, right?

Exactly.


-- 
David Booth, Ph.D.
Cleveland Clinic (contractor)
http://dbooth.org/

Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect those of Cleveland Clinic.

Received on Monday, 8 November 2010 14:43:30 UTC